“Datto Backup 28-Day Backup Heatmap”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Datto Backup 28-Day Backup Heatmap

Analysis and reporting on 28-day backup heatmap for managed service providers.

Built from: Datto Backup
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Datto Backup 28-Day Backup Heatmap

Analysis and reporting on 28-day backup heatmap for managed service providers.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: NOC teams, service managers, and MSP owners monitoring backup compliance

How often: Daily for operations, weekly for management review, monthly for client reporting

Time saved
Checking backup status across all clients manually means logging into multiple consoles. This report pulls everything into one view.
Risk visibility
Backup failures are invisible until a restore fails. This report surfaces gaps before they become incidents.
Compliance evidence
For regulated clients, documented backup status is not optional. This report provides the audit trail.
Report categoryBackup & Data Protection
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceNOC teams, service managers
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Backup › Datto Backup 28-Day Backup Heatmap
What you can measure in this report
Summary Metrics
Perfect Days by Client
28-Day Backup Heatmap Trend (3 Quarters)
Failed Backup Devices: Specific Failures
Backup Job Volume Analysis
28-Day Backup Success Trend
Key Findings
Strategic Recommendations
Frequently Asked Questions
Perfect Days
Worst Day
Weekend Avg
AI-Generated Power BI Report
Datto Backup 28-Day Backup Heatmap

Analysis and reporting on 28-day backup heatmap for managed service providers.

Demo Report: This report uses synthetic data to demonstrate AI-generated insights from Proxuma Power BI. The structure, DAX queries, and analysis reflect real MSP data patterns.
1.0 Summary Metrics
Perfect Days
75,310
Across 204 days
Worst Day
98
Report items (customers)
Weekend Avg
99.0%
Overall average
Weekday Avg
93.8%
Mon-Fri success
View DAX Query - Summary Metrics
EVALUATE ROW("Total History Records", COUNTROWS('BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day'), "Distinct Dates", DISTINCTCOUNT('BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day'[Date]), "Total Report Items", COUNTROWS('BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Report_Items'), "Avg Perfect Pct", AVERAGE('BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day'[Max_Active_Service_Perfect_Percent]))
What are these DAX queries? DAX (Data Analysis Expressions) is the formula language used by Power BI to query data. Each “View DAX Query” section shows the exact query the AI wrote and executed. You can copy any query and run it in Power BI Desktop against your own dataset.
2.0 Perfect Days by Client

Breakdown of 28-day backup heatmap across managed clients.

CloudGuard MSP
98.4%
DataVault Pro
96.2%
IronShield IT
93.8%
SafeHaven Tech
90.1%
Citadel Systems
86.5%
FortKnox IT
81.3%
ClientPerfect DaysWorst DayWeekend AvgWeekday AvgStatus
CloudGuard MSP1887.2%97.1%93.8%Good
DataVault Pro1785.3%94.9%91.7%Good
IronShield IT1783.1%92.6%89.4%Warning
SafeHaven Tech1679.8%88.9%85.9%Warning
Citadel Systems1576.7%85.4%82.5%Critical
FortKnox IT1472.0%80.2%77.5%Good

CloudGuard MSP maintains the highest backup success rate in the portfolio at over 99%. FortKnox IT trails significantly and needs a focused remediation plan addressing VSS errors and storage constraints. Closing this gap would eliminate the most common source of client risk in your backup operations.

View DAX Query - Perfect Days by Client
EVALUATE
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS(
    BI_Datto_Backup_Jobs[company_name],
    "Perfect Days", DIVIDE(
        CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Datto_Backup_Jobs), BI_Datto_Backup_Jobs[is_successful] = TRUE()),
        COUNTROWS(BI_Datto_Backup_Jobs)
    ),
    "Worst Day", COUNTROWS(BI_Datto_Backup_Jobs)
)
ORDER BY [Perfect Days] DESC
3.0 28-Day Backup Heatmap Trend (3 Quarters)

How 28-day backup heatmap has evolved over the past three quarters.

Q1 2026
95.6%
Q4 2025
93.8%
Q3 2025
91.4%
DatePerfect %Total ServicesPerfect Services
2026-01-2097.3%22,02021,295
2026-01-1999.97%22,02822,015
2026-01-1899.97%22,04222,030
2026-01-0982.2%22,83520,187
2026-01-0777.4%22,79719,991

The portfolio shows consistent improvement over three quarters, moving from 91.4% in Q3 2025 to 95.6% in Q1 2026. This upward trend reflects targeted optimization efforts. Maintain the current improvement cadence and extend attention to newly onboarded clients to sustain the trajectory.

View DAX Query - 28-Day Backup Heatmap Trend (3 Quarters)
EVALUATE TOPN(28, GROUPBY('BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day', 'BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day'[Date], "Avg_Perfect_Pct", AVERAGEX(CURRENTGROUP(), 'BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day'[Max_Active_Service_Perfect_Percent]), "Total_Services", SUMX(CURRENTGROUP(), 'BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day'[Max_Active_Service_Count]), "Perfect_Services", SUMX(CURRENTGROUP(), 'BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day'[Max_Active_Service_With_Perfect_Backup_Count])), 'BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day'[Date], DESC) ORDER BY 'BI_Backup_SaasProtection_Backup_History_Summary_Day'[Date] DESC
4.0 Failed Backup Devices: Specific Failures

Individual devices with backup failures in the past 7 days.

ClientDeviceLast SuccessConsecutive FailuresErrorSeverity
Citadel SystemsSRV-DC-012026-03-286VSS writer timeout
Citadel SystemsSRV-SQL-022026-03-304Disk space exhausted
CloudGuard MSPSRV-FILE-012026-04-013Network timeout
SafeHarbor TechWS-CAD-042026-04-022Agent not responding
FortKnox ITSRV-APP-012026-03-259License expired
BackupFirst IncSRV-DC-022026-04-013VSS writer timeout

Citadel Systems has two servers with consecutive failures, including their domain controller SRV-DC-01 which has not backed up successfully since March 28. FortKnox IT's SRV-APP-01 has the longest streak at 9 consecutive failures due to an expired license that should have been caught by proactive monitoring.

5.0 Backup Job Volume Analysis

Daily backup job statistics across the portfolio.

ClientDaily JobsAvg Size (GB)Success RateAvg DurationEfficiency
CloudGuard MSP48124.699.2%42 min
DataVault Pro3689.497.8%38 min
FortKnox IT52156.288.4%68 min
IronShield IT2842.896.4%22 min
Citadel Systems44198.472.4%94 min
SafeHarbor Tech3267.294.8%34 min
Vault360 IT2434.698.6%18 min
BackupFirst Inc40112.891.2%52 min

Citadel Systems runs 44 daily backup jobs with the lowest success rate at 72.4% and the longest average duration at 94 minutes. Their average backup size of 198.4 GB suggests oversized backup sets that should be reviewed. CloudGuard MSP demonstrates best practice with 99.2% success across 48 jobs.

6.0 28-Day Backup Success Trend

Weekly backup success rates for the past 4 weeks.

WeekTotal JobsSuccessfulFailedSuccess RateChange
Mar 10-162,1842,05213293.9%--
Mar 17-232,2162,08213493.9%+0.0%
Mar 24-302,1982,03816092.7%-1.2%
Mar 31-Apr 62,2402,06817292.3%-0.4%

Backup success rates declined from 93.9% to 92.3% over the past four weeks. Failed jobs increased from 132 to 172, a 30.3% increase. The drop began in the week of March 24, which correlates with the Citadel Systems license expiration and increased VSS failures at multiple sites.

7.0
Key Findings
!

Performance Gap Requires Attention

The gap between top and bottom performers is wider than expected. The bottom 20% scores more than 25 percentage points below the portfolio average, indicating structural issues that require targeted intervention.

!

Declining Trend in Moderate Risk Group

Entities in the moderate risk category show a declining trend over the past quarter. Without intervention, 3-4 of these entities may shift to the high-risk category within 60 days.

Top Performers Remain Consistent

The top 30% of the portfolio maintains stable performance above target, indicating current best practices are effective and can serve as a model for the rest.

8.0
Strategic Recommendations

1. Conduct a targeted review of all high-risk entities within 2 weeks. Document the root cause for each entity and create a remediation plan with clear deadlines and accountable owners.

2. Implement automated monitoring for the moderate-risk group. Set thresholds that trigger an alert when performance drops 5 percentage points below target, enabling early intervention before entities slip into high risk.

3. Schedule this report monthly as part of the QBR process. Use the trend data to verify that improvement initiatives are delivering measurable results across multiple quarters.

9.0
Frequently Asked Questions
How do we read a 28-day backup heatmap effectively?

Look for horizontal streaks (persistent device issues) and vertical columns (date-specific events like network outages or maintenance windows that affected many devices).

What patterns in the heatmap indicate systemic issues?

Regular failures on specific weekdays suggest scheduled conflicts. Failures clustering around midnight indicate backup window congestion. Weekend gaps suggest devices being powered off.

How does the heatmap complement the success rate number?

A 95% success rate sounds good, but the heatmap might show that the same 5% of devices fail every single day, which is much worse than random distributed failures.

What time range gives the most useful heatmap view?

28 days captures a full monthly cycle including month-end processing, which is often when backup issues spike due to higher data churn.

What is the RPO risk of a 92% success rate?

At 92%, roughly 1 in 12 backup jobs fails. If backups run daily, that means some devices go 2+ days between successful backups. For servers with RPO targets under 24 hours, a 92% rate is unacceptable.

Should we alert on every backup failure?

Alert on consecutive failures (2+), not single failures. Transient issues like temporary network glitches cause one-off failures that self-correct. Consecutive failures indicate a persistent problem that needs human intervention.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started