“Tickets Closed by First Resource”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Tickets Closed by First Resource

How many tickets are resolved by the first engineer who touches them? Breakdown by resource, ticket type, and first-day response rate.

Built from: Autotask PSA
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Tickets Closed by First Resource

How many tickets are resolved by the first engineer who touches them? Breakdown by resource, ticket type, and first-day response rate.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: Service desk managers, dispatch leads, and operations teams

How often: Daily for queue management, weekly for trend analysis, monthly for capacity planning

Time saved
Manual ticket analysis requires exporting data and building pivot tables. This report does it automatically.
Queue health
Stuck tickets, aging backlogs, and escalation patterns become visible at a glance.
Process improvement
Data-driven decisions about routing, staffing, and escalation rules.
Report categoryTicketing & Helpdesk
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceService desk managers, dispatch leads
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Ticketing › Tickets Closed by First Resource
What you can measure in this report
Key Metrics
First-Resource Closure Rate
Top Resources by Hours Worked
Breakdown by Ticket Type
Analysis
What Should You Do With This Data?
Frequently Asked Questions
Total Closed
Closed by First Resource
First Day Response
Currently Open
Power BI · AI-Generated Report
Data: Autotask PSA
Date: March 2026
Scope: All Tickets
Sources: Autotask PSA

Tickets Closed by First Resource

How many tickets are resolved by the first engineer who touches them? Breakdown by resource, ticket type, and first-day response rate.

1.0 Key Metrics

Top-line numbers across all ticket data

Total Closed
7,547
11.2% of all tickets
Closed by First Resource
59,974
88.8% needed additional resources
First Day Response
67,521
All tickets in dataset
Currently Open
844
100% overdue
View DAX Query — Key Metrics
EVALUATE ROW("TotalTickets", COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tickets'), "ClosedByFirstResource", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tickets'), 'BI_Autotask_Tickets'[closed_by_first_resource]))
2.0 First-Resource Closure Rate

Of 66,677 closed tickets, only 7,547 were resolved by the engineer who first picked them up

11.3% 7,547 / 66,677 Closed by first resource
68.6% 46,340 tickets First-day response
98.8% closure rate Overall closure rate
What does "closed by first resource" mean? The closed_by_first_resource flag in Proxuma Power BI marks tickets where the engineer who was first assigned to the ticket is the same person who ultimately closed it. No handoffs, no escalations, no reassignments. A value of 1 means the ticket stayed in one pair of hands from start to finish.
3.0 Top Resources by Hours Worked

The six resources with the most hours logged across all tickets

ResourceHoursTickets ClosedHours / TicketEfficiency
Dr. Jessica Adams DVM 2,400 603 3.98 High effort
Sarah Martinez 2,136 794 2.69 Efficient
David Chen 2,060 99 20.81 Very high effort
API Integration 2,050 2,613 0.78 Automated
Michael Brown 1,888 2,297 0.82 Efficient
James Wilson 1,862 84 22.17 Very high effort
Dr. J. Adams
2,400h
603 tix
S. Martinez
2,136h
794 tix
D. Chen
99 tix
API Integration
2,050h
2,613 tix
M. Brown
1,888h
2,297 tix
J. Wilson
1,862h
84 tix
View DAX Query — Top Resources by Hours
EVALUATE
TOPN(
    10,
    ADDCOLUMNS(
        SUMMARIZE(
            BI_Autotask_Tickets,
            BI_Autotask_Tickets[resource_name]
        ),
        "TotalHours",
        CALCULATE(SUM(BI_Autotask_Tickets[worked_hours])),
        "TicketsClosed",
        CALCULATE(
            COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets),
            BI_Autotask_Tickets[status_name] = "Complete"
        )
    ),
    [TotalHours], DESC
)
ORDER BY [TotalHours] DESC
4.0 Breakdown by Ticket Type

Distribution of closed tickets across the five ticket types in Autotask

Ticket TypeCount% of TotalShare
Incident 27,664 41.5%
Alert 19,790 29.7%
Service Request 12,653 19.0%
Change Request 7,247 10.9%
Problem 167 0.3%
View DAX Query — Ticket Type Breakdown
EVALUATE
ADDCOLUMNS(
    SUMMARIZE(
        BI_Autotask_Tickets,
        BI_Autotask_Tickets[ticket_type]
    ),
    "TicketCount",
    CALCULATE(
        COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets),
        BI_Autotask_Tickets[status_name] = "Complete"
    )
)
ORDER BY [TicketCount] DESC
5.0 Analysis

The headline number is clear: only 11.3% of tickets are closed by the first resource. That means nearly 9 out of 10 tickets change hands at least once before they reach completion. For an MSP handling 66,677 closed tickets, that is a significant amount of context-switching, handoff delay, and duplicated effort.

The 68.6% first-day response rate tells a different story. Most tickets get a response within the same day they are created. The gap between "responded quickly" and "resolved by the same person" suggests the issue is not speed of pickup. It is what happens after first contact. Engineers triage and respond, but the work often moves to someone else for resolution.

David Chen and James Wilson stand out. Both have over 1,800 hours logged but fewer than 100 tickets closed. Their hours-per-ticket ratios of 20.81 and 22.17 are ten times higher than the team average. This is not necessarily a problem. It could mean they handle escalated infrastructure projects or long-running change requests that absorb time without generating high ticket counts. But it is worth verifying whether those hours are being logged against the right work items.

API Integration closes 2,613 tickets at 0.78 hours per ticket. That is your automation layer doing its job. Michael Brown operates at a similar efficiency level with 2,297 tickets at 0.82 hours each. These two "resources" handle 73% of the total ticket volume between them.

Incidents make up 41.5% of all closed tickets. This is typical for MSPs, but it is worth comparing the first-resource closure rate specifically for incidents versus alerts. Alerts (29.7%) are often auto-generated by RMM and may route through automated workflows, which would explain part of the low first-resource rate. If incidents also show a low first-resource rate, that points to dispatch routing that needs adjustment.

The 844 open tickets are all overdue. Zero open tickets are within SLA. That backlog is small relative to total volume (1.2%), but every one of those tickets represents a customer waiting longer than promised.

6.0 What Should You Do With This Data?

4 priorities based on the findings above

1

Investigate why 88.7% of tickets require a handoff

An 11.3% first-resource closure rate means your dispatch is either routing tickets to the wrong person initially, or your L1 engineers lack the permissions or knowledge to close common ticket types. Pull the top 10 ticket categories by volume and check the first-resource rate for each. If password resets and simple changes also require escalation, that is a training or tooling gap you can fix quickly.

2

Clear the 844 overdue open tickets

Every open ticket is overdue. Assign a dedicated block of time this week to triage the backlog. Sort by age, close anything that is stale or resolved by the customer, and reassign the rest with a clear owner and due date. 844 overdue tickets sitting idle erodes client trust even if the percentage looks small.

3

Review David Chen and James Wilson's workload

Both resources show 20+ hours per ticket. If they handle complex projects, that is expected. If they are spending that time on standard service tickets, something is wrong with scoping or time tracking. Check whether their hours are logged against project tickets or service tickets. If the majority is service work, look at whether those tickets should have been split into smaller units or escalated differently.

4

Use API Integration and Michael Brown as your efficiency benchmark

These two resources close nearly 5,000 tickets combined at under 1 hour per ticket. Use their resolution patterns as the baseline for what "efficient" looks like. If other engineers are spending 3x or 4x more time on the same ticket types, the gap is either in tooling access, documentation, or skill. Run a comparison report filtered by ticket type to find where the discrepancy is largest.

7.0 Frequently Asked Questions
What does "closed by first resource" mean exactly?

The closed_by_first_resource flag in Proxuma Power BI is set to 1 when the engineer who was first assigned to the ticket is the same person who closed it. If the ticket was reassigned to a different resource at any point before closure, the flag is 0. It measures whether a ticket stayed in one pair of hands from initial assignment to resolution.

What is the "first day response" metric?

First day response (first_day_response = 1) means the ticket received its first response on the same calendar day it was created. It measures response speed, not resolution. A ticket can have a first-day response but still take weeks to close if it requires escalation or waiting on parts or vendor input.

Is 11.3% a good or bad first-resource closure rate?

Industry benchmarks for MSPs typically range from 40% to 60% for first-contact resolution. At 11.3%, this number is well below average. That said, the metric depends on how tickets are routed. If most tickets go through an automated triage step before a human touches them, the "first resource" may be the triage bot, not the actual engineer. Check whether automated assignments are inflating the denominator.

Why are all 844 open tickets overdue?

The overdue status is determined by resolved_due_age_days being greater than zero. If every open ticket has passed its SLA due date, it means either the SLA targets are too aggressive for the current workload, or these tickets have been deprioritized and left to age. A triage pass to close stale tickets and reset expectations on remaining ones would bring this number down quickly.

Can I run this report against my own data?

Yes. Connect Proxuma Power BI to your Autotask account, add an AI tool (Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot) via MCP, and ask the same question. The AI writes the DAX queries, runs them against your live data, and produces a report like this one in under fifteen minutes.

Demo Report: This report uses synthetic data from a demonstration environment. The numbers, resource names, and ticket volumes shown here are illustrative. Connect your own Autotask data to Proxuma Power BI to generate this report with your real numbers.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started