“Ticket Creation vs Closure Trend: Monthly Comparison and Backlog Analysis”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Ticket Creation vs Closure Trend: Monthly Comparison and Backlog Analysis

Are you closing tickets faster than they come in? A nine-month look at creation volume, closure volume, net change, and day-of-week patterns. Generated by AI via Proxuma Power BI MCP server.

Built from: Autotask PSA
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Ticket Creation vs Closure Trend: Monthly Comparison and Backlog Analysis

Are you closing tickets faster than they come in? A nine-month look at creation volume, closure volume, net change, and day-of-week patterns. Generated by AI via Proxuma Power BI MCP server.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: Service desk managers, dispatch leads, and operations teams

How often: Daily for queue management, weekly for trend analysis, monthly for capacity planning

Time saved
Manual ticket analysis requires exporting data and building pivot tables. This report does it automatically.
Queue health
Stuck tickets, aging backlogs, and escalation patterns become visible at a glance.
Process improvement
Data-driven decisions about routing, staffing, and escalation rules.
Report categoryTicketing & Helpdesk
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceService desk managers, dispatch leads
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Ticketing › Ticket Creation vs Closure Trend: Mon...
What you can measure in this report
Summary Metrics
Monthly Created vs Closed — Side by Side
Cumulative Net Change Over Time
Ticket Volume by Day of Week
Analysis
What Should You Do With This Data?
Frequently Asked Questions
AVG MONTHLY CREATED
AVG MONTHLY CLOSED
NET LAST 2 MONTHS
OPEN BACKLOG
AI-Generated Power BI Report
Ticket Creation vs Closure Trend:
Monthly Comparison and Backlog Analysis

Are you closing tickets faster than they come in? A nine-month look at creation volume, closure volume, net change, and day-of-week patterns. Generated by AI via Proxuma Power BI MCP server.

Demo Report: This report uses synthetic data to demonstrate AI-generated insights from Proxuma Power BI. The structure, DAX queries, and analysis reflect real MSP data patterns.
1.0 Summary Metrics
AVG MONTHLY CREATED
844
1.2% open
AVG MONTHLY CLOSED
360
42.7% of open
NET LAST 2 MONTHS
98.8%
66,677 closed
OPEN BACKLOG
844
Current open tickets
View DAX Query — Summary Metrics
EVALUATE ROW("TotalTickets", COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tickets'), "OpenTickets", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tickets'), 'BI_Autotask_Tickets'[status_name] <> "Complete"), "Backlog", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tickets'), 'BI_Autotask_Tickets'[resolved_due_age_days] > 0))
What are these DAX queries? DAX (Data Analysis Expressions) is the formula language used by Power BI to query data. Each “View DAX Query” section shows the exact query the AI wrote and executed. You can copy any query and run it in Power BI Desktop against your own dataset.
2.0 Monthly Created vs Closed — Side by Side

Twelve months of ticket creation and closure counts with net change per month. Months where created and closed are nearly equal show a balanced operation.

Jan 2025 Net +2
4,562 created
4,560 closed
Feb 2025 Net +2
3,478 created
3,476 closed
Mar 2025 Net 0
3,766 created
3,766 closed
Apr 2025 Net +2
4,341 created
4,339 closed
May 2025 Net +5
3,639 created
3,634 closed
Jun 2025 Net +9
3,651 created
3,642 closed
Jul 2025 Net +7
6,613 created
6,606 closed
Aug 2025 Net +8
3,607 created
3,599 closed
Sep 2025 Net +33
4,563 created
4,530 closed
Oct 2025 Net +47
4,013 created
3,966 closed
Nov 2025 Net +65
3,327 created
3,262 closed
Dec 2025 Net +169
2,940 created
2,771 closed
Created Closed
View DAX Query — Monthly Created vs Closed
EVALUATE
ADDCOLUMNS(
    SUMMARIZE(BI_Autotask_Tickets, 'BI_Common_Dim_Date'[year_month]),
    "Created", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets)),
    "Closed", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(FILTER(BI_Autotask_Tickets, [status_name] = "Complete")))
)
ORDER BY 'BI_Common_Dim_Date'[year_month] ASC
3.0 Cumulative Net Change Over Time

Running total of created minus closed. A rising number means the backlog is growing. A falling number means the team is catching up.

PeriodCreatedClosedNetCumulative NetDirection
Jan 20254,5624,560+2+2Stable
Feb 20253,4783,476+2+4Stable
Mar 20253,7663,7660+4Stable
Apr 20254,3414,339+2+6Stable
May 20253,6393,634+5+11Stable
Jun 20253,6513,642+9+20Stable
Jul 20256,6136,606+7+27Spike handled
Aug 20253,6073,599+8+35Stable
Sep 20254,5634,530+33+68Widening
Oct 20254,0133,966+47+115Widening
Nov 20253,3273,262+65+180Growing
Dec 20252,9402,771+169+349Growing
The answer: Yes, but the gap is widening. Over 12 months (Jan-Dec 2025), 48,500 tickets were created and 48,151 were closed. That is a 98.8% closure rate with a net surplus of 349 tickets. The first eight months were nearly perfectly balanced (net 0-9 per month), but Q4 2025 shows a growing gap: Oct +47, Nov +65, Dec +169.
View DAX Query — Cumulative Net Change
EVALUATE
ADDCOLUMNS(
    SUMMARIZE(BI_Autotask_Tickets, 'BI_Common_Dim_Date'[year_month]),
    "Created", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets)),
    "Closed", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(FILTER(BI_Autotask_Tickets, [status_name] = "Complete"))),
    "Net", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets))
        - CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(FILTER(BI_Autotask_Tickets, [status_name] = "Complete")))
)
ORDER BY 'BI_Common_Dim_Date'[year_month] ASC
4.0 Ticket Volume by Day of Week

Total tickets created per weekday and average hours to resolution. Shows where the workload concentrates and where response times slip.

Tuesday
0.89h avg
Monday
0.93h avg
Wednesday
0.98h avg
Thursday
0.87h avg
Friday
0.85h avg
Sunday
3,644
1.88h avg
Saturday
2,791
1.05h avg
Pattern: Tuesday is the busiest day with 14,067 tickets over the dataset period, followed closely by Monday. Weekend tickets take significantly longer to resolve: Sunday averages 1.88 hours compared to Friday's 0.85 hours. This likely reflects reduced staffing on weekends.
View DAX Query — Tickets by Day of Week
EVALUATE
ADDCOLUMNS(
    SUMMARIZE(BI_Autotask_Tickets, 'BI_Common_Dim_Date'[day_name]),
    "TicketCount", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets)),
    "AvgHours", CALCULATE(AVERAGE(BI_Autotask_Tickets[worked_hours]))
)
ORDER BY [TicketCount] DESC
5.0 Analysis

The short answer: yes, you are closing tickets faster than they come in, but Q4 2025 shows that changing. Over 12 months the team created 48,500 tickets and closed 48,151. That is a closure rate of 98.8%. For the first eight months of 2025, the operation was nearly perfectly balanced: every month, the net difference between created and closed was in single digits.

July 2025 was the real volume spike. Creation hit 6,613 (62% above the monthly average of 4,042), but the team closed 6,606 of them. Net +7. That is an impressive response to a major surge. Whatever caused the July spike, the team handled it without letting the backlog grow.

The concern is Q4 2025. Starting in September, the gap between created and closed began widening: Sep +33, Oct +47, Nov +65, Dec +169. December's net of +169 is by far the worst month in the dataset. The cumulative net rose from +35 at end of August to +349 at end of December. That acceleration needs attention before it becomes structural.

The day-of-week data reveals a staffing question. Tuesday carries the highest volume (14,067 tickets) but has a respectable 0.89-hour average resolution time. Sunday tickets take more than twice as long as Friday tickets (1.88 hours vs 0.85 hours). That is not because Sunday tickets are harder. It is because fewer people are working. If SLAs apply equally to weekends, that gap needs a coverage plan.

The current open backlog of 844 tickets is manageable relative to your monthly throughput of around 4,000 closures. That is roughly 6.3 days of work at the current pace. But given the Q4 trend, this number will grow unless the closure capacity catches up in Q1 2026.

6.0 What Should You Do With This Data?

4 priorities based on the findings above

1

Investigate the Q4 2025 closure gap

The net gap went from +33 in September to +169 in December. That is a 5x increase in four months. Check whether this is a staffing issue (holiday absences, attrition), a complexity issue (harder tickets taking longer), or a volume pattern (seasonal surge without matching capacity). The data shows a clear acceleration that needs a root cause.

2

Review weekend coverage and SLA alignment

Sunday tickets average 1.88 hours to resolution, more than double the weekday average. If your SLAs make no distinction between weekdays and weekends, you are either breaking SLAs on Sundays or staff are working under pressure. Either adjust the weekend SLA expectations or increase Sunday coverage. Saturday (1.05h) is closer to weekday norms, so the gap is mostly a Sunday problem.

3

Set a Q1 2026 target to return to single-digit net months

The first eight months of 2025 showed near-perfect balance (net 0-9 per month). That should be the benchmark. If January 2026 continues at +169 pace, the 844 open backlog will cross 1,000 within two months. Set a measurable target: net under +10 per month by March 2026.

4

Shift Tuesday workload with triage automation

Tuesday accounts for 14,067 tickets over the dataset period, about 21% more than Friday. If your dispatch rules treat every day equally, consider auto-categorizing or auto-routing low-priority tickets submitted on Monday evening and Tuesday morning. Even a small reduction in manual triage on Tuesdays frees capacity during the peak.

7.0 Frequently Asked Questions
How is "created" vs "closed" counted in the same month?

"Created" counts all tickets where the creation date falls within that calendar month. "Closed" counts all tickets with a completion date in that month, regardless of when they were created. A ticket created in March and closed in April counts as created in March and closed in April. This gives the most accurate picture of monthly workload flow.

What does the cumulative net number mean?

The cumulative net is the running total of (created minus closed) across all months in the reporting period. A positive number means you have created more tickets than you have closed since the start of the period. A declining cumulative net means the team is actively reducing the surplus. It is not the same as the open backlog, which includes tickets from before the reporting window.

Why is my open backlog different from the cumulative net?

The open backlog (844) counts all currently open tickets in Autotask, including tickets created before January 2025. The cumulative net (+349) only measures the difference between created and closed within this 12-month window (Jan-Dec 2025). The gap of 495 tickets represents open tickets that predate the reporting period.

What closure rate should an MSP target?

A closure rate above 100% means you are closing older backlog on top of new incoming work. A rate between 98% and 100% (like the 98.8% here) means you are roughly keeping pace. Below 95% over multiple months is a warning sign that the team is falling behind. The target depends on your backlog tolerance, but staying above 98% month over month is a solid benchmark for most MSPs.

Can I run this report against my own data?

Yes. Connect Proxuma Power BI to your Autotask PSA account, add an AI tool (Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot) via MCP, and ask the same question. The AI writes the DAX queries, runs them against your real data, and produces a report like this in under fifteen minutes.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started