“Tasks Starting Soon & Overdue: Project Task Health for MSPs”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Tasks Starting Soon & Overdue: Project Task Health for MSPs

Which project tasks are behind schedule, which projects carry the most overdue work, and where actual hours already exceed estimates. Generated by AI via Proxuma Power BI MCP server.

Built from: Autotask PSA
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Tasks Starting Soon & Overdue: Project Task Health for MSPs

Which project tasks are behind schedule, which projects carry the most overdue work, and where actual hours already exceed estimates. Generated by AI via Proxuma Power BI MCP server.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: Service desk managers, dispatch leads, and operations teams

How often: Daily for queue management, weekly for trend analysis, monthly for capacity planning

Time saved
Manual ticket analysis requires exporting data and building pivot tables. This report does it automatically.
Queue health
Stuck tickets, aging backlogs, and escalation patterns become visible at a glance.
Process improvement
Data-driven decisions about routing, staffing, and escalation rules.
Report categoryTicketing & Helpdesk
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceService desk managers, dispatch leads
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Ticketing › Tasks Starting Soon & Overdue: Pr...
What you can measure in this report
Summary Metrics
Breakdown by Client
Trend Analysis (3 Quarters)
SLA Risk Quadrant
Ticket Detail by Priority
Service Desk Health Overview
Key Findings
Strategic Recommendations
Frequently Asked Questions
Primary Metric
Secondary Metric
Coverage Rate
AI-Generated Power BI Report
Tasks Starting Soon & Overdue:
Project Task Health for MSPs

Which project tasks are behind schedule, which projects carry the most overdue work, and where actual hours already exceed estimates. Generated by AI via Proxuma Power BI MCP server.

Demo Report: This report uses synthetic data to demonstrate AI-generated insights from Proxuma Power BI. The structure, DAX queries, and analysis reflect real MSP data patterns.
1.0
Summary Metrics
Key indicators for Tasks Starting Soon & Overdue:Project Task Health for MSPs.
Primary Metric
438
end_date past, status not Complete
Secondary Metric
119
Currently active
Coverage Rate
323
New / Planned / Waiting
Trend Direction
0
None scheduled in the window
Data note: Calculated from the most recent complete dataset.
View DAX Query - Ticket Summary Metrics
EVALUATE
VAR today = TODAY()
RETURN ROW(
  "TotalTasks", COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tasks'),
  "ActiveNotStarted", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tasks'), 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[status_name] IN {"New","Planned","Waiting Customer","Waiting for third party"}),
  "InProgress", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tasks'), 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[status_name] = "In progress"),
  "StartingThisWeek", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tasks'), 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[status_name] <> "Complete", 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[start_date] >= today, 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[start_date] <= today + 7),
  "StartingNext30Days", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tasks'), 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[status_name] <> "Complete", 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[start_date] >= today, 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[start_date] <= today + 30),
  "OverdueOpen", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tasks'), 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[status_name] <> "Complete", 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[end_date] < today),
  "DueThisWeekOpen", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tasks'), 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[status_name] <> "Complete", 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[end_date] >= today, 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[end_date] <= today + 7)
)
2.0
Breakdown by Client
#ProjectClientOverdue TasksWorked Hours Logged
1Project HappyMitchell-Everett132
2Project BagMitchell-Everett51
3Project AnyoneRamos Group42181.4h
4Project SetSmith and Sons40101.5h
5Project HimDoyle-Contreras1141.3h
6Project ProfessionalGonzales and Sons11
7Project FeelWu-Jackson11266.8h
8Project AllowMitchell-Everett11
9Project ProfessionalKeith, Keller and Adams10
10Project NextLittle Group740.0h
11Project PaperGreen PLC422.8h
12Project MrRivers, Rogers and Mitchell4208.1h
13Project HusbandMartin Group411.8h
14Project HowLee-Dalton41.5h
15Project OwnerClements, Pham and Garcia427.0h

The gap between top and bottom performers requires attention.

View DAX Query - Performance by Queue
EVALUATE
TOPN(15,
  ADDCOLUMNS(
    SUMMARIZE(FILTER('BI_Autotask_Tasks','BI_Autotask_Tasks'[status_name] <> "Complete" && 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[end_date] < TODAY()), 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[project_name],'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[company_name]),
    "OverdueTasks", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tasks'),'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[status_name] <> "Complete", 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[end_date] < TODAY()),
    "WorkedHours", CALCULATE(SUM('BI_Autotask_Tasks'[worked_hours]),'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[status_name] <> "Complete", 'BI_Autotask_Tasks'[end_date] < TODAY())
  ),
  [OverdueTasks], DESC
)
3.0
Trend Analysis (3 Quarters)
Q1 2026
87.4%
Q4 2025
84.2%
Q3 2025
81.8%

Improvement from 81.8% to 87.4% over three quarters.

View DAX Query - Ticket Volume Trend
EVALUATE
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS(
    BI_Autotask_Tickets[created_month],
    "NewTickets", COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets),
    "Resolved", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets), BI_Autotask_Tickets[status] = "Complete"),
    "SLARate", [AT - SLA Met Rate %]
)
ORDER BY BI_Autotask_Tickets[created_month] ASC
4.0
SLA Risk Quadrant
Mapping clients by ticket volume and SLA compliance.
HIGH RISK
4 entities
Performance significantly below portfolio average. Immediate action required.
MODERATE RISK
7 entities
Performance below target but stable. Review within 2 weeks.
LOW RISK
12 entities
Performance above target level. Standard monitoring sufficient.
NOT ASSESSED
3 entities
Insufficient data available for risk assessment.

The risk matrix shows that most entities fall in the low-risk category, but the high-risk group demands immediate attention. The moderate-risk group shows a declining trend that could escalate without intervention.

5.0
Ticket Detail by Priority
Granular breakdown of ticket handling times.
CategoryItemsPrimarySecondaryStatus
Category A23494.2%14Healthy
Category B18789.3%20Review
Category C15691.7%13Healthy
Category D9886.7%13Review
Category E6782.1%12At Risk
Category F4595.6%2Healthy

The detailed breakdown shows clear performance differences. The bottom two categories require targeted action to improve overall portfolio health.

6.0
Service Desk Health Overview
Key health indicators for the service desk.
92.4% health score
Portfolio Health
87.3% of 100%
Coverage
23 action items
Open Items

Overall portfolio health is strong at 92.4%, but the 87.3% coverage rate suggests that roughly 1 in 8 entities is not fully monitored. The 23 open action items represent a manageable backlog if addressed within 2 weeks.

7.0
Key Findings
!

Performance Gap Requires Attention

The gap between top and bottom performers is wider than expected. The bottom 20% scores more than 25 percentage points below the portfolio average, indicating structural issues that require targeted intervention.

!

Declining Trend in Moderate Risk Group

Entities in the moderate risk category show a declining trend over the past quarter. Without intervention, 3-4 of these entities may shift to the high-risk category within 60 days.

Top Performers Remain Consistent

The top 30% of the portfolio maintains stable performance above target, indicating current best practices are effective and can serve as a model for the rest.

8.0
Strategic Recommendations

1. Conduct a targeted review of all high-risk entities within 2 weeks. Document the root cause for each entity and create a remediation plan with clear deadlines and accountable owners.

2. Implement automated monitoring for the moderate-risk group. Set thresholds that trigger an alert when performance drops 5 percentage points below target, enabling early intervention before entities slip into high risk.

3. Schedule this report monthly as part of the QBR process. Use the trend data to verify that improvement initiatives are delivering measurable results across multiple quarters.

9.0
Frequently Asked Questions
How often is this report updated?

Data syncs every 24 hours from the source systems. The report reflects the most recent complete dataset.

Can I use this report in QBR presentations?

Yes. This report is designed to be QBR-ready. Export the key metrics and trend data to include in your quarterly business review.

What should I do about high-risk entities?

Schedule a targeted review for each high-risk entity. Create an action plan with remediation steps and follow up within 2 weeks.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started