Analysis and reporting on m365 adoption vs tickets - does adoption reduce support load? for managed service providers.
Analysis and reporting on m365 adoption vs tickets - does adoption reduce support load? for managed service providers.
The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.
Who should use this: Service desk managers, dispatch leads, and operations teams
How often: Daily for queue management, weekly for trend analysis, monthly for capacity planning
Analysis and reporting on m365 adoption vs tickets - does adoption reduce support load? for managed service providers.
EVALUATE ROW("M365Users", SUM('BI_MicrosoftPartnerCenter_Subscribed_Skus'[consumed_units]), "Tickets", COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Tickets'), "M365Customers", DISTINCTCOUNT('BI_MicrosoftPartnerCenter_Subscribed_Skus'[customer_id]))Each dot represents one client. X-axis is adoption score (0-100%), Y-axis is tickets per user per month. Green = ideal quadrant (high adoption, low tickets). Amber = mid-range. Red = problem zone (low adoption, high tickets).
Which M365 services each client uses. Bars show adoption rate per service. Sorted by total adoption score, top 8 clients.
EVALUATE
ADDCOLUMNS(
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS(
BI_M365_Lighthouse_MAU[service_name],
"Total MAU", SUM(BI_M365_Lighthouse_MAU[monthly_active_users]),
"Total Users", SUM(BI_M365_Lighthouse_MAU[total_users]),
"Related Tickets", CALCULATE(
COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets),
TREATAS(VALUES(BI_M365_Lighthouse_MAU[service_name]), BI_Autotask_Tickets[category])
)
),
"Adoption Rate", DIVIDE([Total MAU], [Total Users]),
"Ticket Share", DIVIDE([Related Tickets], COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets))
)
ORDER BY [Adoption Rate] DESCTickets per user per month, split by adoption tier. High-adoption clients (green) consistently run at less than half the ticket rate of low-adoption clients (red). The gap has remained stable over six months.
EVALUATE
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS(
BI_Autotask_Tickets[snapshot_month],
"High Adoption Tickets/User", CALCULATE(
DIVIDE(COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets), SUM(BI_M365_Lighthouse_MAU[total_users])),
BI_M365_Lighthouse_MAU[adoption_tier] = "High"
),
"Low Adoption Tickets/User", CALCULATE(
DIVIDE(COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Tickets), SUM(BI_M365_Lighthouse_MAU[total_users])),
BI_M365_Lighthouse_MAU[adoption_tier] = "Low"
)
)
ORDER BY BI_Autotask_Tickets[snapshot_month] ASCSupport cost per user per month broken down by adoption tier. The gap between low and high adoption represents $5.20/user/month in avoidable support spend.
Not all services have equal impact on ticket volume. Intune adoption at 45% is the biggest gap, with device-related tickets making up 28% of total volume.
| Service | Adoption Rate | Related Ticket % | Impact Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intune |
45%
|
28% | High Impact |
| SharePoint |
67%
|
18% | Medium Impact |
| OneDrive |
72%
|
12% | Medium Impact |
| Teams |
89%
|
8% | Low Impact |
| Power BI |
11%
|
2% | Low Impact |
The impact score combines adoption gap size with the share of related tickets. Intune stands out because it is only deployed to 45% of users while device-related issues account for 28% of all tickets. Deploying Intune to the remaining 55% would reduce device configuration drift, patch compliance failures, and manual enrollment requests. Teams and Power BI have low impact scores for different reasons: Teams is already nearly universal (89%), so there is little room to grow, while Power BI generates very few tickets regardless of adoption level (2%).
The -0.61 correlation between M365 adoption and ticket volume is statistically significant across the 28-tenant portfolio. This is not a coincidence. Tenants that actively use more M365 services create fewer support requests per user, and the effect is consistent across industries and company sizes in the dataset. The relationship holds when controlling for company size, industry, and contract type.
Adoption below 50% is the danger zone. The six clients in the low-adoption tier generate 2.3x more tickets per user than their high-adoption counterparts. The jump from 50% to 75% adoption delivers the steepest reduction in ticket volume. Above 75%, returns diminish but remain positive. This suggests a natural threshold where self-service capability kicks in and users stop needing helpdesk intervention for routine tasks.
Intune is the highest-impact adoption gap in the portfolio. At just 45% adoption, it leaves the majority of users without automated device management, compliance enforcement, and zero-touch provisioning. Device-related tickets (configuration issues, enrollment problems, compliance failures) represent 28% of all ticket volume. Closing this single gap would cut total ticket volume by an estimated 12-15% across the portfolio.
The financial case is clear. Moving the six low-adoption clients from $8.40/user/month to the medium tier at $5.80 would save roughly $2,400/month in support costs. That figure accounts for approximately 180 users across the six clients. Reaching high-adoption levels would push savings to $4,200/month. The investment required is primarily in change management and training rather than licensing, since most of these clients already own the M365 licenses they are not using.
Intune is the single highest-impact adoption gap. Target the 15 tenants below 60% Intune adoption with a phased rollout: pilot group first, then full deployment. Expected impact: 12-15% reduction in device-related tickets within 90 days.
Horizon MSP (34%), NovaTech (38%), and Ironclad (42%) are well below the 50% danger zone. Schedule a 60-minute adoption workshop with each client's IT lead to identify barriers and build a 90-day adoption plan. These clients already hold the licenses but are not using them.
SharePoint sits at 67% adoption while file-sharing and permissions tickets make up 18% of volume. Migrate the remaining shared drives and legacy file servers to SharePoint Online. This removes the root cause of a significant ticket category.
Include M365 adoption scores in Quarterly Business Reviews as a leading indicator. Clients who see their adoption gaps alongside ticket volume data are more likely to invest in training and change management. Tie adoption improvements to projected support cost savings.
The 14 clients above 75% adoption are performing well with an average of 0.21 tickets/user/month. Maintain their current support model and use them as case studies for the adoption workshops with lower-tier clients.
A correlation of -0.61 means there is a moderate-to-strong negative relationship between M365 adoption and ticket volume. In practical terms: as adoption goes up, tickets go down, and the effect is consistent enough to act on. It does not mean adoption directly causes fewer tickets in every case, but the pattern is strong enough across 28 tenants to be considered reliable for planning purposes.
Intune has the highest impact score because it is deployed to only 45% of users while device-related tickets account for 28% of total volume. Deploying Intune addresses device configuration drift, manual enrollment, and compliance failures. SharePoint is the second-highest impact at 67% adoption with 18% of related tickets.
Based on the trend data, ticket reduction typically becomes visible within 60-90 days of reaching a new adoption tier. Intune deployments show faster results (30-45 days) because device management automation kicks in immediately. SharePoint and OneDrive migrations take longer (90-120 days) because users need time to adjust workflows.
Yes. The cost impact data shows a clear financial case: high-adoption clients pay $3.20/user/month in support costs compared to $8.40 for low-adoption clients. For a 50-user tenant, that is a difference of $260/month or $3,120/year. Most adoption improvements require training and change management rather than new licenses, making the ROI straightforward to present in QBRs.
Yes. All metrics in this report use per-user rates (tickets per user per month, cost per user per month) specifically to normalize for client size. A 200-user client and a 20-user client are compared on the same scale. The correlation of -0.61 holds across both small and large tenants in the portfolio.
Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.
See more reports Get started