“Pipeline vs Capacity: Can You Actually Deliver What You're Selling?”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Pipeline vs Capacity: Can You Actually Deliver What You're Selling?

Cross-source analysis combining HubSpot CRM pipeline data with Autotask PSA capacity metrics to answer whether current service delivery resources can support the active sales pipeline.

Built from: Autotask PSA HubSpot CRM Proxuma Power BI AI via MCP
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Pipeline vs Capacity: Can You Actually Deliver What You're Selling?

Cross-source analysis combining HubSpot CRM pipeline data with Autotask PSA capacity metrics to answer whether current service delivery resources can support the active sales pipeline.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: Sales leads, MSP owners, and account managers tracking pipeline health

How often: Weekly for pipeline reviews, monthly for forecasting, quarterly for strategy

Time saved
Building pipeline reports from CRM exports requires manual filtering and formatting. This report automates it.
Pipeline clarity
Deal stage distribution, win rates, and conversion patterns at a glance.
Forecast accuracy
Historical close rates and deal aging data to improve pipeline forecasting.
Report categorySales & Pipeline
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceSales leads, MSP owners
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Sales › Pipeline vs Capacity: Can You Actuall...
What you can measure in this report
Executive Summary
Pipeline Overview
Capacity Analysis
Pipeline-to-Capacity Ratio
Win Rate Analysis
Revenue Efficiency
Key Findings
Recommended Actions
Frequently Asked Questions
Active Pipeline
Capacity Utilization
Revenue per FTE
Power BI Report

Pipeline vs Capacity: Can You Actually Deliver What You're Selling?

Cross-source analysis combining HubSpot CRM pipeline data with Autotask PSA capacity metrics to answer whether current service delivery resources can support the active sales pipeline.

Demo report. This report was generated using sample data from the Proxuma Power BI demo environment. Connect your own HubSpot and Autotask accounts to generate this report with your real numbers.
1.0 Executive Summary
Active Pipeline
$3.94M
124 opportunities
Capacity Utilization
6.4%
93.6% available
Revenue per FTE
$190K
$17.6M / 92.45 FTE
Win Rate
15.7%
18 of 115 deals

The short answer: yes, you can deliver. With 93.6% of service capacity sitting idle, the bottleneck is not delivery. It is the front of the funnel. The team has $3.94M in active pipeline spread across 124 opportunities, but only 15.7% of deals actually close. That 15.7% win rate against a $7M lost-deal pile is where the real problem lives.

How this report was built: DAX queries pulled opportunity data from the BI_Autotask_Opportunities table and resource/time data from BI_Autotask_Resources and BI_Autotask_TimeEntries. HubSpot deal data came from the BI_HubSpot_Deals table. The AI cross-referenced both sources to calculate pipeline-to-capacity ratios. All queries are shown in the expandable DAX sections below.
2.0 Pipeline Overview

The combined pipeline across Autotask and HubSpot tells a clear story. There are 1,465 total opportunities on record, with 124 currently active at a combined value of $3,938,803. The lost column is harder to look at: $7,059,325 in deals that did not close.

That lost-deal figure is nearly double the active pipeline. Whether those losses came from pricing, timing, or competitive pressure, it points to a conversion problem that no amount of spare capacity will fix.

35.8% ACTIVE Pipeline Split
(Active vs Lost)
64.2% LOST Lost Deals
$7,059,325
SourceCountValue
HubSpot115$354,349
Autotask1,465-
View DAX Query: Pipeline Overview
EVALUATE ROW("TotalDeals", COUNTROWS('BI_HubSpot_Deals'), "TotalAmount", SUM('BI_HubSpot_Deals'[amount]), "Opportunities", COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Opportunities'))
3.0 Capacity Analysis

Current capacity utilization sits at 6.4%. That is not a typo. With 92.45 FTE on the books and 50,752 total hours logged, the numbers show a workforce that has room to absorb significantly more work without adding headcount.

This level of spare capacity (93.6%) means the organization could triple or quadruple its client base from a pure delivery standpoint. The constraint is not people. It is pipeline conversion.

Utilized
6.4%
Available
93.6%
MetricValue
Employees75
Managers14
Ratio18.7%
View DAX Query: Capacity Metrics
EVALUATE ROW("Employees", [Total Employees], "Managers", [Total Managers], "ManagerRatio", [Manager Ratio], "AvgSpan", [Average Span of Control])
4.0 Pipeline-to-Capacity Ratio

Can the team deliver what the sales pipeline promises? Yes, with significant margin.

At 6.4% utilization and $42,605 in pipeline per FTE, the delivery organization is nowhere near its ceiling. Even if every single active opportunity closed tomorrow, the team would still have capacity to spare. The $3.94M active pipeline divided across 92.45 FTE gives each resource roughly $42,605 in potential new work.

For context, the current revenue per FTE is $190,445. Adding the full active pipeline would only push that to around $233,000 per FTE, well within normal MSP operating ranges. The real question is not "can we deliver?" but "can we close?"

5.0 Win Rate Analysis

Out of 115 HubSpot deals, only 18 closed as won. That is a 15.7% win rate. For managed services, industry benchmarks typically sit between 25% and 40%. This number is below the floor.

A low win rate combined with massive spare capacity creates a specific pattern: the organization is generating enough leads but losing too many of them during the sales process. Whether the issue is pricing, proposal quality, sales cycle length, or competitive positioning, improving this single metric would have the largest impact on revenue growth without any increase in delivery costs.

15.7% WIN RATE 18 Won / 115 Deals
MetricValueBenchmark
HubSpot Deals115-
Deals Won18-
Win Rate15.7%Benchmark: 25-40%
Lost Deal Value$7,059,3251.8x active pipeline
View DAX Query: Win Rate Calculation
EVALUATE
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS(
    "TotalDeals", COUNTROWS('BI_HubSpot_Deals'),
    "DealsWon", CALCULATE(
        COUNTROWS('BI_HubSpot_Deals'),
        'BI_HubSpot_Deals'[dealstage] = "closedwon"
    ),
    "WinRate", DIVIDE(
        CALCULATE(
            COUNTROWS('BI_HubSpot_Deals'),
            'BI_HubSpot_Deals'[dealstage] = "closedwon"
        ),
        COUNTROWS('BI_HubSpot_Deals')
    ) * 100
)
6.0 Revenue Efficiency

Revenue per FTE currently sits at $190,445 ($17.6M total revenue divided by 92.45 FTE). For managed services providers, this figure varies widely depending on service mix, but the combination of high revenue per head and low utilization suggests the existing client base is generating solid returns per person.

The disconnect between high revenue per FTE and low utilization indicates that much of the workforce may be in non-billable or support roles, or that the utilization metric captures a broader headcount than just the delivery team. Either way, the numbers confirm there is no delivery bottleneck preventing growth.

MetricValue
Total Revenue$17,600,000
Total FTE92.45
Revenue per FTE$190,445
Pipeline per FTE$42,605
7.0 Key Findings
!

Win rate of 15.7% is well below MSP benchmarks

Only 18 out of 115 HubSpot deals converted. Industry norms range from 25% to 40%. Every percentage point improvement at current pipeline volume translates to roughly $34,000 in additional revenue.

!

$7.06M in lost deals is nearly double the active pipeline

The lost-deal pile points to systemic issues in the sales process. Whether it is pricing, timing, or competitive pressure, a formal win/loss analysis should be the next step to identify patterns.

93.6% spare capacity means delivery is not the bottleneck

The organization could absorb multiple times its current workload without adding headcount. Any sales improvement will flow directly to the bottom line without requiring new delivery investment.

8.0 Recommended Actions

1. Conduct a formal win/loss analysis on the $7M in lost deals. Categorize losses by reason (price, timing, competitor, no decision) and identify the top two or three patterns. This is the highest-leverage activity available right now.

2. Set a win rate target of 25% within two quarters. Moving from 15.7% to 25% at current pipeline volume would add an estimated $360,000 in new revenue without increasing lead generation spend.

3. Review the sales process for friction points. With 115 deals in HubSpot and only 18 closing, something is breaking between qualification and close. Map the stage-by-stage drop-off to find where deals stall or die.

4. Rebalance investment from delivery to sales enablement. Given 93.6% spare capacity, reallocating even a small portion of delivery budget toward proposal quality, sales training, or competitive positioning tools would have outsized returns.

5. Track pipeline-to-capacity ratio monthly. Build this into the monthly reporting cadence so leadership can see whether sales growth is outpacing delivery readiness before it becomes a problem.

9.0 Frequently Asked Questions
Where does the pipeline data come from?

Pipeline data is pulled from two sources: Autotask PSA opportunities and HubSpot CRM deals. Proxuma Power BI connects to both platforms and the AI runs DAX queries against each dataset. The combined view gives a complete picture that neither system provides on its own.

How is capacity utilization calculated?

Capacity utilization divides total hours logged by total available hours (FTE count multiplied by 2,080 annual working hours). At 50,752 hours logged across 92.45 FTE, that comes out to 6.4%. This measures actual time tracked against theoretical maximum capacity.

Is a 15.7% win rate normal for MSPs?

No. Most managed services providers with a structured sales process see win rates between 25% and 40%. A rate of 15.7% suggests either the pipeline includes too many unqualified leads, or deals are being lost during the proposal and negotiation stages.

Why is capacity so low if we have 92 FTE?

The FTE count includes all resources in Autotask, not just billable engineers. Administrative staff, management, and part-time roles are factored in. The 6.4% figure represents total organizational utilization, not just the service desk. Filtering to billable roles only would show a higher number.

What would happen if we doubled our win rate?

Doubling the win rate from 15.7% to 31.4% at the current pipeline volume would roughly double closed revenue from new deals. Given the 93.6% spare capacity, the delivery team could absorb that growth without new hires. The entire revenue increase would flow almost directly to margin.

Can I run this report against my own data?

Yes. Connect Proxuma Power BI to your HubSpot and Autotask accounts, add an AI tool (Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot) via MCP, and ask the same question. The AI writes the DAX queries, runs them against your real data, and produces a report like this in under fifteen minutes.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started