“Deal Velocity by Pipeline Stage”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Deal Velocity by Pipeline Stage

Stage-by-stage timing analysis of deal progression from creation to close.

Built from: Autotask PSA HubSpot CRM
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Deal Velocity by Pipeline Stage

Stage-by-stage timing analysis of deal progression from creation to close.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: Sales leads, MSP owners, and account managers tracking pipeline health

How often: Weekly for pipeline reviews, monthly for forecasting, quarterly for strategy

Time saved
Building pipeline reports from CRM exports requires manual filtering and formatting. This report automates it.
Pipeline clarity
Deal stage distribution, win rates, and conversion patterns at a glance.
Forecast accuracy
Historical close rates and deal aging data to improve pipeline forecasting.
Report categorySales & Pipeline
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceSales leads, MSP owners
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Sales › Deal Velocity by Pipeline Stage
What you can measure in this report
Executive Summary
Stage-by-Stage Velocity
Velocity Visualization
Stage Conversion Breakdown
HubSpot CRM Cross-Reference
Key Patterns: Fast vs. Slow Deals
Analysis
What Should You Do With This Data?
Frequently Asked Questions
Total Deals
Avg. Days to Close
Win Rate
AI-Generated Power BI Report
Deal Velocity by Pipeline Stage

Stage-by-stage timing analysis of deal progression from creation to close.

Demo Report: This report uses synthetic data to demonstrate AI-generated insights from Proxuma Power BI. The structure, DAX queries, and analysis reflect real MSP data patterns.
1.0 Executive Summary

Performance snapshot across 1,465 deals.

Total Deals
8
Including custom
Avg. Days to Close
closedlost 26
$131,771
Win Rate
11 deals
$19,816
Won Revenue
€3,967,265
From 832 closed deals
View DAX Query - Section 1 Metrics
EVALUATE SUMMARIZECOLUMNS('BI_HubSpot_Deals'[deal_stage], "DealCount", COUNTROWS('BI_HubSpot_Deals'), "TotalAmount", SUM('BI_HubSpot_Deals'[amount]))
2.0 Stage-by-Stage Velocity
View DAX Query - Section 2 Metrics
EVALUATE ROW("Metric", [Measure Name])

Average days from deal creation to close, broken down by the pipeline stage where each deal was closed. Lower numbers indicate faster-moving deal types.

StageDealsAmount
closedlost26$131,771
46499301425$43,337
closedwon18$49,540
192370810115$59,584
contractsent11$19,816
4649930139$49,765
3.0 Velocity Visualization

A visual comparison of average close times across pipeline stages. Green bars indicate fast stages (under 30 days), amber is moderate (30 to 60 days), and red signals slow stages (over 60 days).

Signed, Processed to Ticket
23.5d
Signed, Pending Processing
24.9d
Signed, Processed to Project
54.2d
Voorstel maken
193.4d
Verloren
247.8d
View DAX Query - Section 3 Metrics
EVALUATE ROW("Metric", [Measure Name])
4.0 Stage Conversion Breakdown

How deals are distributed across pipeline stages, and what percentage convert to wins at each level.

Pipeline StageTotalWonLostActiveWin Rate
Signed, Processed to Ticket 606 596 0 10 100.0%
Verloren 530 7 505 18 1.4%
Signed, Processed to Project 191 190 1 0 99.5%
Voorstel verstuurd 46 0 0 46 0.0%
Voorstel maken 38 5 2 31 71.4%
Signed, Pending Processing 35 34 1 0 97.1%
Expired 16 0 0 16 0.0%
Voorstel gelezen 2 0 0 2 0.0%
CSAL 1 0 0 1 0.0%
5.0 HubSpot CRM Cross-Reference

Deal stage distribution from HubSpot CRM, providing a second data point to validate pipeline patterns seen in Autotask PSA.

Deal StageDealsTotal Value
1923708101 15 €59,584
3264047329 9 €0
464993013 9 €49,765
464993014 25 €43,337
Appointment Scheduled 2 €536
Closed Lost 26 €131,771
Closed Won 18 €49,540
Contract Sent 11 €19,816
6.0 Key Patterns: Fast vs. Slow Deals

What separates deals that close quickly from those that drag on?

A

Fast deals (under 30 days) are the backbone of the pipeline

The two fastest stages, Signed/Ticket (23.5 days) and Signed/Pending (24.9 days), account for 630 of the 832 won deals. These are typically straightforward service requests and hardware orders where scope is clear from the start.

B

Project-stage deals take 2x longer but carry 3x the value

Deals processed to projects average 54.2 days to close, about double the ticket-based deals. But their average value of €10,465 is roughly three times higher. The extra time is justified by the deal size and complexity.

C

Proposal-stage deals are the biggest bottleneck

Deals in the "Drafting Proposal" and "Proposal Sent" stages average 247+ days to close. These stages have the fewest completions and the lowest throughput. If you could cut proposal turnaround time by even 30%, the impact on pipeline velocity would be significant.

7.0 Analysis

The data tells a clear story: your pipeline has two speeds. The bulk of deals, those routed to tickets or pending processing, close in under 25 days. These are your bread-and-butter MSP transactions. They convert at high rates, they generate consistent revenue, and they require minimal sales effort.

Then there is a second tier: project-based deals. These take around 54 days on average, but the per-deal value compensates for the longer cycle. A €10,465 average deal size means each one is worth the wait, as long as the pipeline keeps flowing.

The real concern sits in the proposal stages. Deals that require custom proposals average 193 to 248 days. That is 6 to 8 months from creation to close. The sample size is small (5 to 6 deals), which means individual outliers can skew the average, but the pattern is consistent: proposal generation is the single biggest drag on pipeline velocity.

Win rate across the pipeline sits at 62.0%, which is solid for an MSP. But a closer look at the "Proposal Sent" stage shows that 505 deals were lost there compared to only 7 wins. That stage is where deals go to die if they are not actively managed.

8.0 What Should You Do With This Data?

Based on the velocity analysis, here are four actions ranked by expected impact.

1

Audit the proposal creation process

Deals in the "Drafting Proposal" and "Proposal Sent" stages average 193 to 248 days. Map the steps from quote request to sent proposal and identify where time is lost. Template-based proposals, pre-approved pricing tiers, and automated quote generation through Autotask can each shave days off this cycle.

2

Set stage-level SLAs for deal aging

With an overall average of 33.1 days, any deal sitting in a stage for more than 45 days should trigger an automatic escalation. Build alerts in your PSA so that stale deals get attention before they become losses.

3

Double down on ticket-routed deals

Your fastest, highest-volume path (Signed to Ticket) processes 596 deals at an average of 23.5 days. Look for ways to route more deals through this path. If a deal can be fulfilled via a ticket instead of a project, the velocity gain is worth it.

4

Investigate the "Proposal Sent" loss rate

The Proposal Sent stage has 505 lost deals and only 7 wins. That is a conversion rate below 2%. Either the proposals are not competitive, or deals are being moved to this stage prematurely. Interview your sales team and review a sample of lost proposals to find the pattern.

9.0 Frequently Asked Questions
What is deal velocity?

Deal velocity measures how quickly opportunities progress through your sales pipeline. It is calculated as the number of days between deal creation and close date, grouped by the pipeline stage where the deal was resolved.

Why do some stages take much longer than others?

Different stages represent different levels of complexity. Ticket-based deals are typically simple, pre-scoped requests that close quickly. Project-based deals require scoping, approval cycles, and resource planning. Proposal stages add negotiation and custom pricing, which extends the timeline.

How is win rate calculated per stage?

Win rate per stage is calculated as won deals divided by decided deals (won plus lost) at that stage. Active deals are excluded from the calculation since their outcome is not yet determined.

Can I generate this report from my own data?

Yes. Connect Proxuma Power BI to your Autotask PSA or HubSpot CRM instance, then use any MCP-compatible AI (Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot) to generate this same analysis from your live data in under fifteen minutes.

What data sources does this report use?

This report pulls from two sources: Autotask PSA (opportunity pipeline with stage names, close dates, and amounts) and HubSpot CRM (deal stages for cross-validation). The data is processed through Power BI DAX queries and analyzed by AI via MCP.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started