“Configuration Items per Client”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Configuration Items per Client

A data-driven analysis of configuration items per client from your Power BI environment, with breakdowns and actionable findings.

Built from: Autotask PSA
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Configuration Items per Client

This report analyzes configuration items per client using data from Autotask PSA.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: Account managers, MSP owners, and service delivery leads

How often: Monthly for client reviews, quarterly for QBRs, on-demand when client signals change

Time saved
Cross-referencing client data from multiple tools manually takes hours. This report brings it together.
Client intelligence
See the full picture of each client across service, satisfaction, and commercial metrics.
Retention data
Early warning signals for at-risk clients, backed by actual data instead of gut feeling.
Report categoryClient Management
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceAccount managers, MSP owners
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Client Management › Configuration Items per Client
What you can measure in this report
Summary Metrics
Ticket Volume by Company
Hours by Company
Revenue by Company
Analysis
Recommended Actions
Frequently Asked Questions
TOTAL TICKETS
TOP CLIENT
TOTAL REVENUE
AI-Generated Power BI Report
Configuration Items per Client

A data-driven analysis of configuration items per client from your Power BI environment, with breakdowns and actionable findings.

Demo Report: This report uses synthetic data to demonstrate AI-generated insights from Proxuma Power BI. The structure, DAX queries, and analysis reflect real MSP data patterns.
1.0 Summary Metrics
TOTAL TICKETS
39,226
Across all 15 companies
TOP CLIENT
Wilson-Murphy
1,002 tickets
TOTAL REVENUE
€10,539,134
15 clients
View DAX Query — Summary query
-- Combined summary metrics from Power BI dataset
What are these DAX queries? DAX (Data Analysis Expressions) is the formula language Power BI uses to query data. Each collapsible section below shows the exact query the AI wrote and ran. You can copy any query and run it in Power BI Desktop against your own dataset.
1.0 Ticket Volume by Company

Clients ranked by total ticket count from the demo dataset

Wilson-Murphy
1,002
Burke, Armstrong and Morg
1,629
Lopez-Reyes
1,317
Ford, Mclean and Robinson
1,684
Lewis LLC
1,758
Thompson, Contreras and R
1,803
Stephens-Martinez
1,481
Rivers, Rogers and Mitche
6,381
Blanchard-Glenn
2,364
Martin Group
2,775
ClientCIsTicketsHoursCI/Ticket
Martin Group2105277520460.76
Craig-Huynh1584545835750.29
Lewis LLC985175812060.56
Little Group720529030500.14
Wall PLC411237614790.17
Richards, Bell and Christensen2718236600.33
Lopez-Reyes29513176700.22
Price-Gomez28121808230.13
Wu-Jackson2519145900.28
Burke, Armstrong and Morgan24616299430.15
View DAX Query — Ticket Volume by Company query
EVALUATE TOPN(10, ADDCOLUMNS(VALUES(BI_Autotask_Companies[company_name]), "CICount", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Configuration_Items)), "TicketCount", [Tickets - Count - Created], "HoursWorked", [Tickets - Hours Worked], "CIPerTicket", DIVIDE(CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Autotask_Configuration_Items)), [Tickets - Count - Created])), [CICount], DESC)
2.0 Hours by Company

Total hours logged per company

Richards, Bell and Christ
782
Wu-Jackson
962
Price-Gomez
864
Martin Group
2,217
Thompson, Contreras and R
1,006
Doyle-Contreras
961
Clements, Pham and Garcia
866
None
7,264
Lewis LLC
2,801
Little Group
3,791
CompanyHours
Richards, Bell and Christensen782.4
Wu-Jackson962.0
Price-Gomez864.9
Martin Group2,217.0
Thompson, Contreras and Rios1,006.1
Doyle-Contreras961.9
Clements, Pham and Garcia866.3
-7,264.2
Lewis LLC2,801.1
Little Group3,791.4
Craig-Huynh4,370.4
Rivers, Rogers and Mitchell1,661.8
Burke, Armstrong and Morgan1,312.3
Wall PLC1,696.9
Ramos Group1,170.6
View DAX Query — Hours by Company query
EVALUATE TOPN(15, SUMMARIZECOLUMNS('BI_Autotask_Companies'[company_name], "Hours", SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked])), [Hours], DESC)
3.0 Revenue by Company

Revenue breakdown by company from billing data

Montgomery-Peck
Hahn Group
Wu-Jackson
Torres-Jones
Thompson, Contreras and R
Patterson, Riley and Laws
Richards, Bell and Christ
Burke, Armstrong and Morg
Price-Gomez
Little Group
CompanyRevenue
Montgomery-Peck€214,468
Hahn Group€253,148
Wu-Jackson€321,669
Torres-Jones€255,698
Thompson, Contreras and Rios€320,831
Patterson, Riley and Lawson€416,449
Richards, Bell and Christensen€328,164
Burke, Armstrong and Morgan€469,660
Price-Gomez€286,926
Little Group€1,431,177
Wall PLC€476,622
Craig-Huynh€2,324,616
Martin Group€637,091
Lopez-Reyes€589,694
Lewis LLC€2,212,914
View DAX Query — Revenue by Company query
EVALUATE TOPN(15, SUMMARIZECOLUMNS('BI_Autotask_Companies'[company_name], "Revenue", SUM('BI_Autotask_Billing_Items'[total_amount])), [Revenue], DESC)
5.0 Analysis

What the data is telling us

Across 39,226 total records, the distribution is heavily concentrated. Wilson-Murphy alone accounts for 2.6% of all volume (1,002 records). This kind of concentration is worth monitoring: if one client consistently dominates workload, it may signal scope creep, inadequate preventive maintenance, or a pricing mismatch.

6.0 Recommended Actions
?

1. Investigate Wilson-Murphy Volume

Wilson-Murphy generates the most activity. Review whether this aligns with their contract scope and SLA tier.

2. Schedule Recurring Review

Set up a weekly or monthly review of configuration items per client metrics. Trends matter more than snapshots. Use the DAX queries in this report as your starting point.

3. Connect Your Own Data

This report uses demo data. Connect Proxuma Power BI to your own Autotask PSA to generate this analysis from your real numbers.

7.0 Frequently Asked Questions
What data sources does the Configuration Items per Client report use?

This report pulls data from PSA through the Proxuma Power BI integration, using DAX queries against the live data model.

How often is this data refreshed?

The underlying Power BI dataset refreshes daily. Reports can be regenerated at any time for the latest figures.

Can I customize this configuration items per client report?

Yes. Proxuma reports are fully customizable. You can modify the DAX queries, add new sections, or adjust the analysis to match your specific MSP needs.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started