“Microsoft 365 User Changes Monitor”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Microsoft 365 User Changes Monitor

Track user additions, removals, and license modifications across all managed tenants in the last 30 days.

Built from: M365 Lighthouse
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Microsoft 365 User Changes Monitor

Track user additions, removals, and license modifications across all managed tenants in the last 30 days.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: NOC teams, service managers, and operations leads managing alert workflows

How often: Daily for alert triage, weekly for noise reduction, monthly for monitoring optimization

Time saved
Alert noise drowns out real issues. This report separates signal from noise so your team focuses on what matters.
Alert hygiene
Stale monitors, noisy devices, and misconfigured thresholds waste technician time. This report finds them.
Operations data
Evidence for tuning alert policies, adjusting thresholds, and improving response workflows.
Report categoryRMM & Alert Management
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceNOC teams, service managers
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › RMM & Alerts › Microsoft 365 User Changes Monitor
What you can measure in this report
Summary Metrics
Top Tenants by User Additions
User Removal Hotspots
Alert Risk Matrix
Alert Detail by Category
Device Fleet Health Overview
Key Findings
Strategic Recommendations
Frequently Asked Questions
Users Added
Users Removed
Net Change
AI-Generated Power BI Report
Microsoft 365 User Changes Monitor

Track user additions, removals, and license modifications across all managed tenants in the last 30 days.

Demo Report: This report uses synthetic data to demonstrate AI-generated insights from Proxuma Power BI. The structure, DAX queries, and analysis reflect real MSP data patterns.
1.0 Summary Metrics
Users Added
384
Last 30 days
Users Removed
127
Last 30 days
Net Change
+257
3.8% growth
Tenants Changed
68
Of 142 total
View DAX Query - Summary Metrics
EVALUATE
ROW(
    "UsersAdded", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Microsoft_UserChanges), BI_Microsoft_UserChanges[change_type] = "Added"),
    "UsersRemoved", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Microsoft_UserChanges), BI_Microsoft_UserChanges[change_type] = "Removed"),
    "NetChange", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Microsoft_UserChanges), BI_Microsoft_UserChanges[change_type] = "Added") - CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Microsoft_UserChanges), BI_Microsoft_UserChanges[change_type] = "Removed")
)
2.0 Top Tenants by User Additions

Tenants that added the most users in the last 30 days.

Contoso Ltd
68 added
Adventure Works
52 added
Fabrikam Inc
44 added
Woodgrove Bank
38 added
Litware Inc
31 added
Tailspin Toys
27 added
TenantUsers AddedUsers RemovedNet ChangeCurrent TotalGrowth %
Contoso Ltd6812+56542+11.5%
Adventure Works528+44318+16.1%
Fabrikam Inc4415+29284+11.4%
Woodgrove Bank385+33196+20.2%
Litware Inc313+28158+21.5%
Tailspin Toys2722+5213+2.4%

Contoso Ltd leads in absolute additions with 68 new users, but Litware Inc and Woodgrove Bank show the strongest relative growth at 21.5% and 20.2% respectively. Tailspin Toys added 27 users but also removed 22, resulting in just 2.4% net growth. This high churn pattern at Tailspin deserves a check-in call.

View DAX Query - Top Tenants by User Additions
EVALUATE
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS(
    BI_Microsoft_UserChanges[tenant_name],
    "UsersAdded", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Microsoft_UserChanges), BI_Microsoft_UserChanges[change_type] = "Added"),
    "UsersRemoved", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(BI_Microsoft_UserChanges), BI_Microsoft_UserChanges[change_type] = "Removed")
)
ORDER BY [UsersAdded] DESC
3.0 User Removal Hotspots

Tenants with the most user removals that may signal churn risk.

Datum Corp
28 removed
Tailspin Toys
22 removed
Northwind Traders
18 removed
Proseware Inc
15 removed
Fabrikam Inc
15 removed
TenantUsers RemovedRemoval RateReason (Top)Risk Level
Datum Corp2814.2%Departmental restructureHigh
Tailspin Toys2210.3%Contract renegotiationMedium
Northwind Traders188.7%Seasonal workforceLow
Proseware Inc156.9%UnknownHigh
Fabrikam Inc155.3%Office closureMedium

Datum Corp removed 28 users (14.2% of their base), the highest removal rate across the portfolio. While some removals at Northwind Traders are seasonal and expected, the 15 unexplained removals at Proseware Inc should be flagged for immediate follow-up. Account managers should verify whether these represent genuine downsizing or a migration to another provider.

View DAX Query - User Removal Hotspots
EVALUATE
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS(
    BI_Microsoft_UserChanges[tenant_name],
    FILTER(BI_Microsoft_UserChanges, BI_Microsoft_UserChanges[change_type] = "Removed"),
    "UsersRemoved", COUNTROWS(BI_Microsoft_UserChanges),
    "RemovalRate", DIVIDE(COUNTROWS(BI_Microsoft_UserChanges), RELATED(BI_Microsoft_Tenants[total_users]))
)
ORDER BY [UsersRemoved] DESC
4.0
Alert Risk Matrix
Categorizing clients by alert severity and device health.
HIGH RISK
4 entities
Performance significantly below portfolio average. Immediate action required.
MODERATE RISK
7 entities
Performance below target but stable. Review within 2 weeks.
LOW RISK
12 entities
Performance above target level. Standard monitoring sufficient.
NOT ASSESSED
3 entities
Insufficient data available for risk assessment.

The risk matrix shows that most entities fall in the low-risk category, but the high-risk group demands immediate attention. The moderate-risk group shows a declining trend that could escalate without intervention.

5.0
Alert Detail by Category
Granular breakdown of alert types and resolution status.
CategoryItemsPrimarySecondaryStatus
Category A23494.2%14Healthy
Category B18789.3%20Review
Category C15691.7%13Healthy
Category D9886.7%13Review
Category E6782.1%12At Risk
Category F4595.6%2Healthy

The detailed breakdown shows clear performance differences. The bottom two categories require targeted action to improve overall portfolio health.

6.0
Device Fleet Health Overview
Overall health indicators across the managed fleet.
92.4% health score
Portfolio Health
87.3% of 100%
Coverage
23 action items
Open Items

Overall portfolio health is strong at 92.4%, but the 87.3% coverage rate suggests that roughly 1 in 8 entities is not fully monitored. The 23 open action items represent a manageable backlog if addressed within 2 weeks.

7.0
Key Findings
!

Performance Gap Requires Attention

The gap between top and bottom performers is wider than expected. The bottom 20% scores more than 25 percentage points below the portfolio average, indicating structural issues that require targeted intervention.

!

Declining Trend in Moderate Risk Group

Entities in the moderate risk category show a declining trend over the past quarter. Without intervention, 3-4 of these entities may shift to the high-risk category within 60 days.

Top Performers Remain Consistent

The top 30% of the portfolio maintains stable performance above target, indicating current best practices are effective and can serve as a model for the rest.

8.0
Strategic Recommendations

1. Conduct a targeted review of all high-risk entities within 2 weeks. Document the root cause for each entity and create a remediation plan with clear deadlines and accountable owners.

2. Implement automated monitoring for the moderate-risk group. Set thresholds that trigger an alert when performance drops 5 percentage points below target, enabling early intervention before entities slip into high risk.

3. Schedule this report monthly as part of the QBR process. Use the trend data to verify that improvement initiatives are delivering measurable results across multiple quarters.

9.0
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as a user change?

Any addition or removal of a licensed user within a tenant. License SKU changes (e.g., upgrading from E3 to E5) are tracked separately.

How quickly do changes appear?

User changes sync within 24 hours of the actual change in the Microsoft 365 tenant.

Should seasonal removals concern us?

Not necessarily. Some industries have predictable seasonal patterns. Flag tenants with unexpected removal spikes for follow-up.

How do we differentiate growth from license optimization?

Compare additions against removals. If a tenant adds 20 and removes 18, they are likely optimizing rather than growing.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started