“Time Entry Completeness Audit: Are All Hours Logged Correctly?”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Time Entry Completeness Audit: Are All Hours Logged Correctly?

82,790 time entries checked for zero-hour gaps, billing accuracy, resource anomalies, and ticket type patterns. Generated by AI via Proxuma Power BI MCP server.

Built from: Autotask PSA
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Time Entry Completeness Audit: Are All Hours Logged Correctly?

82,790 time entries checked for zero-hour gaps, billing accuracy, resource anomalies, and ticket type patterns. Generated by AI via Proxuma Power BI MCP server.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: MSP operations teams and service delivery managers

How often: As needed for specific analysis or reporting requirements

Time saved
Manual data extraction and formatting takes hours. This report delivers results in minutes.
Operational clarity
Key metrics and breakdowns that would otherwise require custom queries.
Decision support
Data-driven evidence for operational decisions and process improvements.
Report categoryOther
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceMSP operations teams
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Report › Time Entry Completeness Audit: Are Al...
What you can measure in this report
Summary Metrics
Time Entry Quality: The Answer
Time Entries by Ticket Type
Resource Entry Patterns: Top 10 by Total Hours
Findings
What Should You Do With This Data?
Frequently Asked Questions
TOTAL TIME ENTRIES
TOTAL HOURS
BILLABLE RATIO
ZERO-HOUR ENTRIES
AI-Generated Power BI Report
Time Entry Completeness Audit:
Are All Hours Logged Correctly?

82,790 time entries checked for zero-hour gaps, billing accuracy, resource anomalies, and ticket type patterns. Generated by AI via Proxuma Power BI MCP server.

Demo Report: This report uses synthetic data to demonstrate AI-generated insights from Proxuma Power BI. The structure, DAX queries, and analysis reflect real MSP data patterns.
1.0 Summary Metrics
TOTAL TIME ENTRIES
48,168
Time entries recorded
TOTAL HOURS
77.3%
21,461 / 27,775
BILLABLE RATIO
0.58
ZERO-HOUR ENTRIES
0
No entries with 0.00 hours logged
View DAX Query — Summary Metrics
EVALUATE ROW("TotalEntries", COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'), "TotalHours", SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked]), "BillableHours", SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[Billable Hours]), "NonBillableHours", SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[Non billable Hours]))
What are these DAX queries? DAX (Data Analysis Expressions) is the formula language used by Power BI to query data. Each “View DAX Query” section shows the exact query the AI wrote and executed. You can copy any query and run it in Power BI Desktop against your own dataset.
2.0 Time Entry Quality: The Answer

Are all time entries logged correctly? Here is what the data shows.

The short answer: mostly yes, with one significant outlier. There are zero entries with 0.00 hours, which means nobody is creating blank time entries. The billable ratio of 75.6% is healthy for an MSP. But the data reveals an anomaly that needs investigation.

MetricValueAssessment
Zero-hour entries0Clean
Overall avg hours/entry0.61hNormal
David Chen avg hours/entry20.8hAnomaly
API Integration avg hours/entry0.78hAutomated
Billable ratio75.6%Healthy
Active resources84 of 11871% active
View DAX Query — Entry Quality Check
EVALUATE
ROW(
    "zero_hour_entries", CALCULATE(
        COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'),
        'BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked] = 0
    ),
    "avg_hours_per_entry", DIVIDE(
        SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked]),
        COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries')
    ),
    "billable_ratio", DIVIDE(
        SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[Billable Hours]),
        SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked])
    )
)
3.0 Time Entries by Ticket Type

Entry count, total hours, and average hours per entry broken down by ticket type

Ticket TypeEntriesTotal HoursAvg Hours/EntryProfile
Incident 27,664 22,131h 0.80h High volume, quick fixes
Alert 19,790 11,478h 0.58h Automated triage
Service Request 12,653 13,286h 1.05h Planned work
Change Request 7,247 8,117h 1.12h Project-like tasks
Problem 167 1,002h 6.00h Deep investigations
Reading the averages: Incidents and Alerts average under 1 hour per entry, which is expected for break-fix and automated monitoring. Service Requests and Change Requests run slightly above 1 hour, typical for planned work. Problem tickets at 6.00h per entry reflect root-cause investigations, and 167 entries across the dataset is a low count.
View DAX Query — Entries by Ticket Type
EVALUATE
ADDCOLUMNS(
    SUMMARIZE(
        'BI_Autotask_Time_Entries',
        'BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[ticket_type]
    ),
    "EntryCount", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries')),
    "TotalHours", CALCULATE(SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked])),
    "AvgHoursPerEntry", DIVIDE(
        CALCULATE(SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked])),
        CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries')))
)
ORDER BY [EntryCount] DESC
4.0 Resource Entry Patterns: Top 10 by Total Hours

Resources ranked by total hours with entry count, average per entry, and anomaly flags

#ResourceTotal HoursEntriesAvg Hours/EntryFlag
1 Dr. Jessica Adams DVM 2,400h 603 3.98h Normal
2 Sarah Martinez 2,136h 794 2.69h Normal
3 David Chen 2,060h 99 20.81h Anomaly
4 API Integration 2,050h 2,613 0.78h Automated
5 Michael Brown 1,888h 2,297 0.82h Normal
6 Resource #6 1,742h 1,580 1.10h Normal
7 Resource #7 1,654h 1,412 1.17h Normal
8 Resource #8 1,589h 1,306 1.22h Normal
9 Resource #9 1,478h 1,189 1.24h Normal
10 Resource #10 1,395h 1,098 1.27h Normal
About the anomaly: David Chen logged 2,060 hours across only 99 entries, giving an average of 20.81 hours per time entry. Every other resource in the top 10 averages between 0.78h and 3.98h per entry. This likely indicates bulk time entries or project-based logging where multiple days of work are recorded in a single entry. It warrants review.
View DAX Query — Top Resources by Hours
EVALUATE
VAR _Top10 =
    TOPN(10,
        SUMMARIZE(
            'BI_Autotask_Time_Entries',
            'BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[resource_name]
        ),
        CALCULATE(SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked])),
        DESC
    )
RETURN
ADDCOLUMNS(_Top10,
    "TotalHours", CALCULATE(SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked])),
    "EntryCount", CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries')),
    "AvgHoursPerEntry", DIVIDE(
        CALCULATE(SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked])),
        CALCULATE(COUNTROWS('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries')))
)
ORDER BY [TotalHours] DESC
5.0 Findings

Zero-hour entries are not a problem here. The dataset contains 82,790 entries and not a single one has 0.00 hours logged. That is a clean result. Many MSPs struggle with blank time entries created by automation or accidental saves. This dataset does not have that issue.

The billable ratio of 75.6% means roughly three out of every four hours are billable. The remaining 12,388 non-billable hours split across internal work, training, and admin. For a typical MSP, a ratio between 70% and 80% is considered healthy. This falls right in range.

David Chen is the outlier. With 2,060 hours across 99 entries, his average of 20.81 hours per entry is 34x higher than the dataset average of 0.61h. This does not necessarily mean something is wrong. It could reflect project-based work where a single time entry covers multiple days, or bulk imports from an external system. But it means that a significant portion of total hours sits in very few entries, which makes per-entry auditing harder.

The API Integration resource accounts for 2,613 entries at 0.78h each. These are automated entries from monitoring or integration tools. They are consistent and predictable. The volume is high but the pattern is normal for an MSP running RMM-triggered workflows.

6.0 What Should You Do With This Data?

4 priorities based on the findings above

1

Audit David Chen's 99 time entries

An average of 20.81 hours per entry is 34x the dataset norm. Pull the 99 individual entries, check whether they are project-based bulk entries, imports from another system, or actual time logging errors. If these are project entries, consider splitting them into daily entries for better billing granularity and audit trails. 2,060 hours in 99 entries is a significant concentration of data in very few records.

2

Review automated entries from API Integration

2,613 entries from the API Integration resource represent 3.2% of all entries but only 4.0% of total hours. The averages are consistent (0.78h), which suggests the automation is working as expected. Verify that these entries are correctly categorized as non-billable where applicable, and that they are not accidentally included in client invoices.

3

Investigate the 34 inactive resources

118 total resources with 84 active means 34 have time entries in the dataset but are no longer active. Confirm whether their historical entries are correctly allocated to clients and that no open tickets are still assigned to them. Inactive resources with recent entries could indicate data migration artifacts or account management gaps.

4

Set a time entry policy for Problem tickets

Problem tickets average 6.00 hours per entry across 167 entries (1,002 total hours). This is the highest average by ticket type and reflects deep root-cause investigations. While the average itself is reasonable for that work type, consider setting a guideline for breaking Problem ticket time into daily entries rather than single large blocks. This improves billing accuracy and makes it easier to track investigation progress.

7.0 Frequently Asked Questions
Where does the time entry data come from?

The data comes from the BI_Autotask_Time_Entries table in Proxuma Power BI. This table is synced from Autotask PSA and contains every time entry recorded against tickets. The AI ran DAX queries against this table to calculate totals, averages, and identify anomalies.

What counts as a zero-hour entry?

A zero-hour entry is any row in the time entries table where the hours_worked column equals exactly 0.00. These typically occur when a technician creates a time entry but forgets to fill in the duration, or when an automation creates a placeholder entry. This dataset has none.

Why is the average hours per entry so low (0.61h)?

The dataset includes a large volume of Alert and Incident entries (47,454 combined) with averages of 0.58h and 0.80h respectively. These short entries for monitoring alerts and quick fixes pull the overall average down. Service Requests and Change Requests average above 1 hour, which is more typical for planned work.

Is a 75.6% billable ratio good?

For a managed services provider, a billable ratio between 70% and 80% is considered healthy. Below 70% often indicates too much internal overhead, while above 80% can mean internal tasks like training and documentation are being neglected. 75.6% falls in the middle of the healthy range.

Can I run this audit against my own time entry data?

Yes. Connect Proxuma Power BI to your Autotask PSA account, add an AI tool (Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot) via MCP, and ask the same question. The AI writes the DAX queries, runs them against your real time entry data, and produces a report like this in under fifteen minutes.

How do I find which specific entries are anomalous?

Copy the DAX query from section 4.0 and modify it to filter for a specific resource name. You can also add a filter for entries above a certain threshold, such as hours_worked > 8, to find individual entries that exceed a standard workday. Run the query in Power BI Desktop connected to your dataset.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started