“Project Budget Variance”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Project Budget Variance

A data-driven analysis of project budget variance from your Power BI environment, with breakdowns and actionable findings.

Built from: Autotask PSA
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Project Budget Variance

This report analyzes project budget variance using data from Autotask PSA.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: Project managers, operations leads, and MSP owners tracking delivery

How often: Weekly for status updates, milestone dates for escalation, monthly for portfolio review

Time saved
Assembling project status from multiple tools and conversations takes hours. This report pulls it together.
Delivery visibility
Milestone progress, budget variance, and timeline risks across all active projects.
Client communication
Project status data formatted for client-facing updates and steering meetings.
Report categoryProject Management
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceProject managers, operations leads
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Projects › Project Budget Variance
What you can measure in this report
Summary Metrics
Project Summary
Hours by Resource
Monthly Hours Trend
Analysis
Recommended Actions
Frequently Asked Questions
TOTAL HOURS
AI-Generated Power BI Report
Project Budget Variance

A data-driven analysis of project budget variance from your Power BI environment, with breakdowns and actionable findings.

Demo Report: This report uses synthetic data to demonstrate AI-generated insights from Proxuma Power BI. The structure, DAX queries, and analysis reflect real MSP data patterns.
1.0 Summary Metrics
TOTAL HOURS
25,868
15 resources logged
View DAX Query — Summary query
-- Combined summary metrics from Power BI dataset
What are these DAX queries? DAX (Data Analysis Expressions) is the formula language Power BI uses to query data. Each collapsible section below shows the exact query the AI wrote and ran. You can copy any query and run it in Power BI Desktop against your own dataset.
1.0 Project Summary

Active projects ranked by logged hours

Project Professional
50,751
Complete
Project Professional
50,751
New
Project Professional
50,751
Inactive
Project Attention
50,751
Complete
Project Kid
50,751
Complete
Project Police
50,751
Complete
Project Point
50,751
Complete
Project East
50,751
Waiting to star
Project East
50,751
In progress
Project East
50,751
Live
#ProjectClientStatusEstimate (h)Worked (h)Overrun (h)Variance %
1Project EnvironmentLewis LLCComplete1205.01586.7+381.632%
2Project AlongDoyle-ContrerasComplete238.0536.3+298.3125%
3Project NumberLittle GroupComplete24.0302.8+278.81162%
4Project LeaveClements, Pham and GarciaComplete219.0417.3+198.391%
5Project NotMartin GroupComplete5.0155.8+150.83017%
6Project FeelWu-JacksonIn progress161.0276.8+115.872%
7Project ReturnThomas-WatsonComplete36.0135.8+99.8277%
8Project SetSmith and SonsIn progress24.0101.5+77.5323%
9Project ThoughBurke, Armstrong and MorganIn progress269.0338.8+69.826%
10Project PaperGreen PLCLive90.0158.2+68.276%
11Project SafeGeorge LtdComplete117.2185.2+68.058%
12Project SetConway LtdComplete107.0171.2+64.260%
13Project MrRivers, Rogers and MitchellIn progress160.0208.1+48.130%
14Project PlantWelch IncComplete8.054.5+46.5581%
15Project MachineConway LtdComplete43.080.8+37.888%
View DAX Query — Project Summary query
EVALUATE
TOPN(15,
  SELECTCOLUMNS(
    FILTER('BI_Autotask_Projects', 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[estimated_hours] > 0),
    "Project", 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[project_name],
    "Company", 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[company_name],
    "Status", 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[project_status_name],
    "EstHours", 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[estimated_hours],
    "WorkedHours", 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[worked_hours],
    "VarianceHours", 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[worked_hours] - 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[estimated_hours],
    "VariancePct", DIVIDE('BI_Autotask_Projects'[worked_hours] - 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[estimated_hours], 'BI_Autotask_Projects'[estimated_hours])
  ),
  [VarianceHours], DESC
)
2.0 Hours by Resource

Hours logged per resource from the demo dataset

Brandon Lynn
1,343
Brandon Bishop
1,361
Daniel Daniels
1,418
Gregory Horn
1,504
Elizabeth Ortega
1,433
Jennifer King
1,584
Jeremy White
1,492
Dr. Amber Ayala DVM
2,399
Kevin Allen
2,060
James Li
2,135
ResourceHours
Brandon Lynn1,343.7
Brandon Bishop1,361.5
Daniel Daniels1,418.4
Gregory Horn1,504.5
Elizabeth Ortega1,433.4
Jennifer King1,584.5
Jeremy White1,492.5
Dr. Amber Ayala DVM2,399.8
Kevin Allen2,060.1
James Li2,136.0
Maxwell Reed2,050.3
Chelsea Thomas1,779.6
David Hunt1,862.2
Andrew Roberts1,887.7
Jerry Mcfarland1,554.0
View DAX Query — Hours by Resource query
EVALUATE TOPN(15, SUMMARIZECOLUMNS('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[resource_name], "Hours", SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked])), [Hours], DESC)
3.0 Monthly Hours Trend

Monthly hours trend over the observed period

4,1923,6493,1062,5632,021 2,5344,0032,115 202502202504202506202508202510202512202601
MonthHours
2025022,534.3
2025033,330.5
2025043,588.0
2025053,314.9
2025063,198.0
2025073,536.6
2025082,686.4
2025093,864.6
2025104,003.3
2025113,314.2
2025123,247.4
2026012,115.7
View DAX Query — Monthly Hours Trend query
EVALUATE TOPN(12, SUMMARIZECOLUMNS('BI_Common_Dim_Date'[year_month], "Hours", SUM('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[hours_worked])), 'BI_Common_Dim_Date'[year_month], DESC)
5.0 Analysis

What the data is telling us

The team logged 25,868 hours across 15 resources, averaging 1,724 hours per person. Look for outliers on both ends: engineers logging significantly more may be overloaded, while those with low hours may have logging compliance issues.

6.0 Recommended Actions

1. Schedule Recurring Review

Set up a weekly or monthly review of project budget variance metrics. Trends matter more than snapshots. Use the DAX queries in this report as your starting point.

2. Connect Your Own Data

This report uses demo data. Connect Proxuma Power BI to your own Autotask PSA to generate this analysis from your real numbers.

7.0 Frequently Asked Questions
What data sources does the Project Budget Variance report use?

This report pulls data from PSA through the Proxuma Power BI integration, using DAX queries against the live data model.

How often is this data refreshed?

The underlying Power BI dataset refreshes daily. Reports can be regenerated at any time for the latest figures.

Can I customize this project budget variance report?

Yes. Proxuma reports are fully customizable. You can modify the DAX queries, add new sections, or adjust the analysis to match your specific MSP needs.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started