“Device-to-Tech Ratio: Which Teams Are Managing Too Many Endpoints?”
Autotask PSA Datto RMM Datto Backup Microsoft 365 SmileBack HubSpot IT Glue All reports
AI-GENERATED REPORT
You searched for:

Device-to-Tech Ratio: Which Teams Are Managing Too Many Endpoints?

Crossing N-able RMM device inventory with HiBob team structure to reveal which technician teams carry a disproportionate endpoint load - and where capacity planning needs attention.

Built from: Autotask PSA Datto RMM N-able Cove Proxuma Power BI AI via MCP
How this report was made
1
Autotask PSA
Multiple data sources combined
2
Proxuma Power BI
Pre-built MSP semantic model, 50+ measures
3
AI via MCP
Claude or ChatGPT writes DAX queries, executes them, formats output
4
This Report
KPIs, breakdowns, trends, recommendations
Ready in < 15 min

Device-to-Tech Ratio: Which Teams Are Managing Too Many Endpoints?

Crossing N-able RMM device inventory with HiBob team structure to reveal which technician teams carry a disproportionate endpoint load - and where capacity planning needs attention.

The data covers the full scope of Autotask PSA records relevant to this analysis, broken down by the key dimensions your team needs for day-to-day decisions and client reporting.

Who should use this: NOC teams, asset managers, and service delivery leads

How often: Weekly for fleet reviews, monthly for lifecycle planning, quarterly for budgeting

Time saved
Device audits from RMM consoles require clicking through hundreds of screens. This report consolidates everything.
Fleet visibility
Ghost devices, storage issues, and uptime problems across the entire fleet in one view.
Lifecycle planning
Data for hardware refresh cycles, warranty tracking, and capacity planning.
Report categoryDevice & Endpoint Management
Data sourceAutotask PSA · Datto RMM · Datto Backup · Microsoft 365 · SmileBack · HubSpot · IT Glue
RefreshReal-time via Power BI
Generation timeUnder 15 minutes
AI requiredClaude, ChatGPT or Copilot
AudienceNOC teams, asset managers
Where to find this in Proxuma
Power BI › Devices › Device-to-Tech Ratio: Which Teams Are...
What you can measure in this report
Key Performance Indicators
Team Breakdown
Devices Per Technician by Team
Individual Technician Load
Device Type Distribution Across Teams
Workload Distribution
Key Findings
Strategic Recommendations
Frequently Asked Questions
Total Managed Devices
Technicians
Avg Devices / Tech
AI-Generated Power BI Report

Device-to-Tech Ratio: Which Teams Are Managing Too Many Endpoints?

Crossing N-able RMM device inventory with HiBob team structure to reveal which technician teams carry a disproportionate endpoint load - and where capacity planning needs attention.

Demo mode: This report uses synthetic sample data. Connect your own data sources to see real results.
1.0 Key Performance Indicators
Total Managed Devices
90.3
6,953 devices / 77 resources
Technicians
6,953
Across all sites
Avg Devices / Tech
102.6
Above 100 threshold
Teams Over Threshold
3
Require review
How this is calculated: Total devices from BI_NAble_Device_Statistic are divided by the count of active technicians in BI_HiBob_Employees. The threshold of 100 devices per technician is based on industry benchmarks for managed service providers handling mixed workstation and server environments.
Show DAX - Device Count & Average Ratio
EVALUATE ROW("TotalDevices", COUNTROWS('BI_Datto_Rmm_Devices'), "Resources", DISTINCTCOUNT('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[resource_name]), "DevicePerTech", DIVIDE(COUNTROWS('BI_Datto_Rmm_Devices'), DISTINCTCOUNT('BI_Autotask_Time_Entries'[resource_name])))
2.0 Team Breakdown
Team Techs Devices Devices / Tech Status
Infrastructure 3 487 162.3 Over Capacity
Service Desk L2 4 512 128.0 Over Capacity
Field Engineering 3 341 113.7 Over Capacity
Cloud Operations 4 298 74.5 Healthy
Service Desk L1 4 209 52.3 Healthy

Three of the five teams exceed the 100-device threshold. Infrastructure carries the heaviest burden at 162.3 devices per technician - over 60% above the recommended maximum. Service Desk L2 and Field Engineering also run above safe levels, suggesting that workload distribution across teams is uneven.

Show DAX - Devices Per Tech By Team
Devices Per Tech By Team =
VAR _team = SELECTEDVALUE ( BI_HiBob_Employees[team] )
VAR _techCount =
    COUNTROWS (
        FILTER (
            BI_HiBob_Employees,
            BI_HiBob_Employees[team] = _team
        )
    )
VAR _deviceCount =
    COUNTROWS (
        FILTER (
            BI_NAble_Device_Statistic,
            RELATED ( BI_HiBob_Employees[team] ) = _team
        )
    )
RETURN
    DIVIDE ( _deviceCount, _techCount, 0 )
3.0 Devices Per Technician by Team
Infrastructure
162.3
3 techs
Service Desk L2
128.0
4 techs
Field Engineering
113.7
3 techs
Cloud Operations
74.5
4 techs
Service Desk L1
52.3
4 techs

The chart above makes the gap clear. Infrastructure and Service Desk L2 both sit deep in the red zone, while Cloud Operations and Service Desk L1 operate well within safe boundaries. The difference between the most loaded team (162.3) and the least loaded (52.3) is a factor of 3x - a signal that device assignments may not be following headcount changes.

Show DAX - Team Device Summary
Team Device Summary =
SUMMARIZE (
    BI_HiBob_Employees,
    BI_HiBob_Employees[team],
    "Techs", COUNTROWS ( BI_HiBob_Employees ),
    "Devices",
        COUNTROWS (
            FILTER (
                BI_NAble_Device_Statistic,
                RELATED ( BI_HiBob_Employees[team] )
                    = EARLIER ( BI_HiBob_Employees[team] )
            )
        )
)
4.0 Individual Technician Load
Top 10 technicians ranked by assigned device count
Technician Team Devices Direct Reports Load
J. van den Berg Infrastructure 198 2 Critical
R. Bakker Infrastructure 172 0 Critical
M. de Vries Service Desk L2 156 3 Critical
K. Jansen Service Desk L2 141 0 High
T. Meijer Field Engineering 134 1 High
A. Smit Field Engineering 121 0 High
P. Hendriks Infrastructure 117 4 High
S. Vermeer Service Desk L2 108 0 High
L. Dekker Service Desk L2 107 0 High
D. Visser Field Engineering 86 0 Normal

J. van den Berg in Infrastructure manages 198 devices while also supervising 2 direct reports - nearly double the recommended load. Three technicians sit at critical levels (150+), and another five fall in the high-load bracket (100 - 150). Only 10 of the 18 total technicians are shown here; the remaining eight all fall below 85 devices.

5.0 Device Type Distribution Across Teams
Infrastructure
Servers
Workstations
Network
Service Desk L2
Workstations
Other
Field Eng.
Workstations
Network
Other
Cloud Ops
Servers
Workstations
Network
Service Desk L1
Workstations
Other
Servers Workstations Network Devices Other

Device complexity matters as much as raw count. Infrastructure not only manages the most devices per tech, but also handles a heavier server mix (35%). Servers typically require more hands-on maintenance than workstations, which compounds the overload. Cloud Operations has a similar server share (52%) but benefits from a lower device-to-tech ratio overall.

6.0 Workload Distribution
30% over 150
Critical Load (150+)
45% 100 - 150
High Load (100 - 150)
25% under 100
Healthy Load (<100)

Nearly a third of all technicians operate at critical load levels. Combined with the 45% in the high-load bracket, that means 75% of the technical workforce manages more devices than recommended. Only a quarter of technicians fall within healthy parameters. This skew puts service quality and response times at risk across the board.

7.0 Key Findings
!

Infrastructure team runs at 162% of recommended capacity

With only 3 technicians managing 487 devices - including a high proportion of servers - the Infrastructure team faces the most severe overload. This creates a single point of failure risk if any team member is absent or leaves the organization.

!

75% of technicians exceed the safe device threshold

Only 25% of the workforce operates within the recommended 100-device limit. The majority is stretched thin, which correlates with longer ticket response times and higher rates of missed patch windows in other Proxuma reports.

i

Service Desk L1 and Cloud Operations show healthy ratios

These two teams demonstrate that balanced workloads are possible within the current organization. Their device-to-tech ratios (52.3 and 74.5 respectively) leave room for growth without immediate hiring.

8.0 Strategic Recommendations

1. Redistribute devices from Infrastructure to Cloud Operations. Cloud Operations already handles a similar device profile (servers and workstations) but operates at 74.5 devices per tech. Moving 80 - 100 devices from Infrastructure would bring both teams closer to the 100-device target without new hires.

2. Add one technician to Service Desk L2. At 128 devices per tech across 4 people, adding a fifth team member would reduce the ratio to 102.4 - just above threshold. Combined with better device routing, this could bring L2 into the healthy range within one quarter.

3. Implement automated device assignment reviews. Build a monthly Power BI alert that flags any team exceeding 110 devices per technician. This early warning allows the Service Manager to rebalance before teams reach critical load. The DAX measures in sections 1.0 and 2.0 of this report provide the foundation for that alert.

9.0 Frequently Asked Questions
What is a healthy device-to-technician ratio for an MSP?

Industry benchmarks suggest 75 to 100 managed devices per technician for a mixed environment of workstations and servers. The exact number depends on device complexity, automation maturity, and the share of proactive versus reactive work. This report uses 100 as the upper boundary for "healthy."

Where does the device data come from?

Device counts are pulled from the BI_NAble_Device_Statistic table, which syncs daily from N-able RMM. Team and technician information comes from BI_HiBob_Employees. The two datasets are joined through BI_Autotask_Companies to map N-able sites to technician assignments.

How often should this report be reviewed?

Monthly reviews are recommended for stable teams. If a team is going through onboarding, offboarding, or client transitions, a bi-weekly cadence helps catch ratio spikes before they affect service delivery. Pair this report with ticket volume data for a fuller picture of technician workload.

Generate this report from your own data

Connect Proxuma Power BI to your PSA, RMM, and M365 environment, use an MCP-compatible AI to ask questions, and generate custom reports - in minutes, not days.

See more reports Get started